Azizishirazi Ali, Klemish Jaimie L, Pyle Gregory G
British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Jul;40(7):1810-1821. doi: 10.1002/etc.5049. Epub 2021 May 6.
Amphibian populations are declining globally. Major drivers of these global declines are known. However, the contribution of these major drivers to population declines varies by the presence or absence and the interactive effect of drivers, thus creating local challenges for conservation of populations. Studies have determined that environmental contaminants contribute to amphibian population declines. However, there is a disagreement over the use of amphibians as sentinel species in ecotoxicological testing rather than the traditional taxa used, fish and invertebrates. Reviews of ecotoxicological studies have demonstrated that amphibians are generally less sensitive than fish and invertebrates to different groups of contaminants. Nonetheless, because of the distinct nature and mechanism of toxicity of various contaminants, it is necessary to study contaminants individually to be able to come to any conclusion on the relative sensitivity of amphibians. Copper is one of the most studied environmental contaminants. We conducted a literature review of Cu toxicity to amphibians and the relative sensitivity of amphibians to other aquatic animals. The available data suggest that although amphibians may be tolerant of acute Cu exposure, they are relatively sensitive to chronic exposure (i.e., 100-fold greater sensitivity to chronic compared to acute exposure). In addition, ecologically relevant endpoints specific to amphibians (e.g., duration of metamorphosis and behavior) are shown to provide a better understanding of their sensitivity compared to traditional endpoints (e.g., survival and growth). Our current knowledge on amphibian sensitivity is far from complete. Considering the current status of this globally threatened class of animals, it is necessary to fill the knowledge gaps regarding their sensitivity to individual contaminants, beginning with Cu. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1810-1821. © 2021 SETAC.
全球两栖动物数量正在减少。已知造成这些全球数量减少的主要驱动因素。然而,这些主要驱动因素对种群数量减少的贡献因驱动因素的存在与否及其相互作用而有所不同,从而给种群保护带来了局部挑战。研究已确定环境污染物导致两栖动物种群数量减少。然而,对于在生态毒理学测试中使用两栖动物而非传统使用的分类群(鱼类和无脊椎动物)作为指示物种存在分歧。生态毒理学研究综述表明,两栖动物通常比鱼类和无脊椎动物对不同种类的污染物敏感性更低。尽管如此,由于各种污染物毒性的性质和机制不同,有必要分别研究污染物,以便能够就两栖动物的相对敏感性得出任何结论。铜是研究最多的环境污染物之一。我们对铜对两栖动物的毒性以及两栖动物与其他水生动物的相对敏感性进行了文献综述。现有数据表明,尽管两栖动物可能耐受急性铜暴露,但它们对慢性暴露相对敏感(即与急性暴露相比,对慢性暴露的敏感性高100倍)。此外,与传统终点(如生存和生长)相比,特定于两栖动物的生态相关终点(如变态持续时间和行为)能更好地了解它们的敏感性。我们目前对两栖动物敏感性的了解还远远不够完整。考虑到这一全球受威胁动物类群的现状,有必要填补关于它们对个别污染物敏感性的知识空白,首先从铜开始。《环境毒理学与化学》2021年;40:1810 - 1821。© 2021 SETAC。