• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射技师初步图像评估分析——重点关注常见的假阴性。

An analysis of radiographer preliminary image evaluation - A focus on common false negatives.

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Ipswich General Hospital, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.

School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;68(3):237-244. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.466. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1002/jmrs.466
PMID:33750041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8424337/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preliminary image evaluation (PIE) is a mechanism whereby radiographers provide a preliminary evaluation of whether pathology is present in their radiographs, typically acquired within the emergency department (ED). PIE provides referrers with a timely communication of pathology prior to the availability of a radiology report. The purpose of this study was to determine the most common radiographer PIE false-negative interpretations.

METHODS

Each month over a two-year period, 100 PIEs of adult and paediatric patients were randomly reviewed in a metropolitan hospital ED. The radiographer's PIE was compared with the radiologist's report and categorised into basic quality indicators; true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative. The anatomical regions which most commonly indicated a false-negative interpretation were further analysed.

RESULTS

2402 cases were reviewed which resulted in an overall PIE accuracy of 88.7%. Wrists, hands, phalanges (upper), ankles, feet and phalanges (lower) reporting the highest false-negative or false-negative/true-positive interpretations (60/116). Of the 60 false-negative PIEs, 68 pathologies were identified. 41.1% (28/68) of the pathology not identified were in the phalanges. Within these regions, examinations with multiple injuries commonly reported false negatives (17/60).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the most common false-negative radiographer PIEs were within the upper and lower distal extremities. Specifically, the phalanges and examinations demonstrating multiple injuries reported high levels of misinterpretation. The misinterpretation in multi-injury examinations could be attributed to 'Subsequent Search Miss (SSM)' error. These results provide valuable insights into areas of emphasis when providing image interpretation education.

摘要

简介

初步图像评估(PIE)是放射技师对其在急诊科(ED)获得的放射影像中是否存在病理学进行初步评估的机制。PIE 为转诊医生提供了在获得放射学报告之前及时了解病理学的途径。本研究的目的是确定最常见的放射技师 PIE 假阴性解读。

方法

在两年的时间里,每个月在一家大都市医院的 ED 中随机回顾 100 例成人和儿科患者的 PIE。将放射技师的 PIE 与放射科医生的报告进行比较,并分类为基本质量指标;真阳性、真阴性、假阳性和假阴性。进一步分析最常指示假阴性解释的解剖区域。

结果

共回顾了 2402 例病例,总体 PIE 准确率为 88.7%。手腕、手、掌骨(上部)、踝关节、脚和跖骨(下部)的报告假阴性或假阴性/真阳性解读最多(60/116)。在这 60 例假阴性 PIE 中,发现了 68 种病理。未识别的病理有 41.1%(28/68)位于跖骨中。在这些区域中,伴有多处损伤的检查常报告假阴性(17/60)。

结论

本研究表明,最常见的假阴性放射技师 PIE 位于上下肢末端。特别是指骨和显示多处损伤的检查报告了高水平的误读。多处损伤检查中的误读可归因于“后续搜索遗漏(SSM)”错误。这些结果为提供图像解读教育时的重点领域提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/57bb9b7f6ab8/JMRS-68-237-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/7d23b6d6024e/JMRS-68-237-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/f1c69af3dc00/JMRS-68-237-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/57bb9b7f6ab8/JMRS-68-237-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/7d23b6d6024e/JMRS-68-237-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/f1c69af3dc00/JMRS-68-237-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca5/8424337/57bb9b7f6ab8/JMRS-68-237-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of radiographer preliminary image evaluation - A focus on common false negatives.放射技师初步图像评估分析——重点关注常见的假阴性。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;68(3):237-244. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.466. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Reducing risk in the emergency department: a 12-month prospective longitudinal study of radiographer preliminary image evaluations.降低急诊科风险:一项关于放射技师初步影像评估的为期12个月的前瞻性纵向研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Sep;66(3):154-162. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.341. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
3
Analysing false-positive errors when Australian radiographers use preliminary image evaluation.分析澳大利亚放射技师进行初步图像评估时的假阳性错误。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):540-546. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.809. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
Preliminary image evaluation performance of radiographers in one New Zealand District: a 6-month prospective study.新西兰一个地区放射技师的初步影像评估表现:一项为期6个月的前瞻性研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):582-590. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.810. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
5
Reducing diagnostic errors in the emergency department at the time of patient treatment.在患者治疗期间减少急诊科的诊断错误。
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Jun;35(3):466-473. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14146. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
The impact of intensive training in preliminary image evaluation (PIE) for radiographers in the emergency department of a regional hospital in New Zealand - A pilot study.新西兰一家地区医院放射技师在急诊初步影像评估(PIE)强化培训的影响-一项试点研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Mar;30(2):688-693. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
7
Workload as a predictor of radiographer preliminary image evaluation accuracy.工作量作为放射技师初步图像评估准确性的预测指标。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):547-554. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.803. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Real-time x-ray abnormality alerts for emergency departments using a radiographer comment model - a multisite pilot study.利用放射技师评论模型实现急诊科实时 X 射线异常警报——一项多站点试点研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Jan;30(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
9
Accuracy of radiographer comment following a two-month experiential and blended learning in appendicular skeleton X-ray interpretation: The Singapore experience.在经历了两个月的经验学习和混合学习后,放射技师对四肢骨骼 X 射线解读的评论的准确性:新加坡的经验。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Feb;27(1):43-47. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
Accuracy of radiographer preliminary clinical evaluation of skeletal trauma radiographs, in clinical practice at a district general hospital.放射技师对区综合医院临床实践中骨骼创伤 X 光片的初步临床评估的准确性。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 May;28(2):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk-benefit analysis of a multi-site radiographer comment model for emergency departments.急诊科多站点放射技师评论模型的风险效益分析
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14503. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14503. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Artificial intelligence and radiographer preliminary image evaluation: What might the future hold for radiographers providing x-ray interpretation in the acute setting?人工智能与放射技师的初步影像评估:在急性情况下提供X光解读的放射技师的未来会是怎样?
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):495-498. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.821. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Preliminary image evaluation performance of radiographers in one New Zealand District: a 6-month prospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Accident and emergency radiography: A comparison of radiographer commenting and 'red dotting'.急诊放射摄影:放射技师注释与“红点标注”的比较
Radiography (Lond). 2007 Feb;13(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
2
Communicating traumatic pathology to ensure shared understanding: is there a recipe for the perfect preliminary image evaluation?向患者传达创伤病理学知识以确保达成共识:是否有一个完美的初步影像学评估的“配方”?
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Jun;67(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.375. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Radiographic image interpretation by Australian radiographers: a systematic review.
新西兰一个地区放射技师的初步影像评估表现:一项为期6个月的前瞻性研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):582-590. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.810. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
4
Analysing false-positive errors when Australian radiographers use preliminary image evaluation.分析澳大利亚放射技师进行初步图像评估时的假阳性错误。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;71(4):540-546. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.809. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
A revolutionary acute subdural hematoma detection based on two-tiered artificial intelligence model.一种基于双层人工智能模型的革命性急性硬膜下血肿检测方法。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Aug;29(8):858-871. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.76756.
6
The role of quality improvement in radiography.质量改进在放射学中的作用。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;68(3):214-216. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.524. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
澳大利亚放射技师对X光影像的解读:一项系统综述
J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Dec;66(4):269-283. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.356. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Reducing risk in the emergency department: a 12-month prospective longitudinal study of radiographer preliminary image evaluations.降低急诊科风险:一项关于放射技师初步影像评估的为期12个月的前瞻性纵向研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Sep;66(3):154-162. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.341. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
How to correctly put the "subsequent" in subsequent search miss errors.如何在后续搜索遗漏错误中正确放置“后续的”一词。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2648-2657. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01802-8.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non-intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised controlled trial.评估强化与非强化影像解读教育对放射技师的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Mar;66(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.314. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Newly qualified radiographers' perceptions of their abnormality detection abilities and the associated training they received at undergraduate level.新获得资格的放射技师对其异常检测能力的看法以及他们在本科阶段接受的相关培训。
Radiography (Lond). 2018 Aug;24(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
An investigation into the use of radiographer abnormality detection systems by Queensland public hospitals.昆士兰公立医院对放射技师异常检测系统使用情况的调查。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2018 Jun;65(2):80-85. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.278. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
9
The impact of focused training on abnormality detection and provision of accurate preliminary clinical evaluation in newly qualified radiographers.针对性培训对新取得资格的放射技师进行异常检测及提供准确初步临床评估的影响。
Radiography (Lond). 2018 Feb;24(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
The 'radiographer-referrer game': image interpretation dynamics in rural practice.“放射技师-转诊医生博弈”:农村医疗实践中的影像解读动态
J Med Radiat Sci. 2016 Mar;63(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.152. Epub 2016 Jan 20.