The comparison of two methods in cervical smear screening - which method is better for smear adequacy rates?

OBJECTIVES

In the cervical smear screening test as a sample collection method for liquid-based thin layer cytology, classically the collecting device is placed into a liquid fixative solution and vigorously swirled or rotated ten times in the solution and the collection device is removed from the solution. In this study, a plastic smear brush was used as the collection device. After the cervical cell sample was obtained, the smear brush was detached from the stick and left in the solution and given to the laboratory. Our aim in the study is to examine whether smear inadequacy rates have decreased with the method used in the study compared to the classical method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

While the classical technique which the collecting device is placed into a solution and mixed and removed from the solution is defined as Method 1. The technique used in the study was defined as Method 2. The cervical smear screening test results obtained by two different methods in two consecutive time periods were analyzed. The two methods were compared using chi-square test in terms of smear inadequacy.

RESULTS

A total of 2129 test results, including 1129 smears in Method 1 and 1000 smears in Method 2 were examined. The mean ages of the patients tested in both methods were similar (36 ± 6.1 and 37 ± 6.7). Abnormal test result rate was similar for Method 1 and Method 2 (5.8% vs 4.9%, respectively). The inadequate sample rate was higher in Method 1 than Method 2 (8.3% vs 2.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that leaving the smear brush in the solution is a better way to reduce the inadequacy sample rates. This result may guide clinicians about smear techniques.