• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下经皮桡动脉、尺动脉和掌侧桡动脉穿刺冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效。

Outcomes of Dorsal Distal Radial, Radial, and Ulnar Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Ultrasound Guidance in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.

出版信息

Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Jun;46(6):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100822. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100822
PMID:33752064
Abstract

Ultrasound utilization during access enables precise vessel cannulation. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of ultrasound guided dorsal distal radial artery (DDRA), radial, and ulnar cardiac catheterization (CC) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a prospective observational study of 224 patients (58 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from October 2016 to March 2020 (median follow-up of 13 months) and compared the outcomes of ultrasound guided DDRA, ulnar, or radial artery CC and PCI. Groups were divided into DDRA (n = 18, 8.0%), ulnar (n = 94, 42.0%) and radial access (n = 112, 50.0%). Primary endpoints included the number of access attempts and conversion to femoral access. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, in-stent restenosis, and access site complications. In the primary endpoints, no significant difference was found amongst groups in the number of access attempts (P = 0.272) or conversion to femoral access (P = 0.381). In the radial group (59 ± 11 years, median follow-up of 16 months), 2 cardiac mortalities (1 lymphocytic myocarditis, 1 AMI) and 2 noncardiac mortalities occurred. None of the secondary endpoints occurred in the DDRA (66 ± 17 years, median follow-up of 13 months) or ulnar group (56 ± 11 years, median follow-up of 14 months). DDRA and ulnar PCI was safe and efficacious with no complications. Femoral conversion or the number of access attempts was not different between DDRA, ulnar, or radial. Therefore, DDRA and ulnar are viable alternatives for PCI, which can preserve radial for future use.

摘要

超声引导下的入路可以实现精确的血管插管。我们旨在评估超声引导下背侧尺动脉(DDRA)、桡动脉和尺动脉心导管术(CC)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的结果。我们在 2016 年 10 月至 2020 年 3 月对一家学术医疗中心的 224 例患者(58±12 岁)进行了前瞻性观察研究(中位随访 13 个月),并比较了超声引导下的 DDRA、尺动脉或桡动脉 CC 和 PCI 的结果。各组分为 DDRA(n=18,8.0%)、尺动脉(n=94,42.0%)和桡动脉入路(n=112,50.0%)。主要终点包括入路尝试次数和转换为股动脉入路的次数。次要终点包括全因死亡率、心脏死亡率、急性心肌梗死(AMI)、卒中和再次血运重建、支架血栓形成、支架内再狭窄和入路部位并发症。在主要终点方面,各组之间入路尝试次数(P=0.272)或转换为股动脉入路的次数(P=0.381)无显著差异。在桡动脉组(59±11 岁,中位随访 16 个月),2 例发生心脏死亡(1 例淋巴细胞性心肌炎,1 例 AMI)和 2 例非心脏死亡。DDRA 组(66±17 岁,中位随访 13 个月)和尺动脉组(56±11 岁,中位随访 14 个月)均未发生次要终点。DDRA 和尺动脉 PCI 安全有效,无并发症。DDRA、尺动脉和桡动脉之间的股动脉转换或入路尝试次数无差异。因此,DDRA 和尺动脉是 PCI 的可行替代方案,可以保留桡动脉以备将来使用。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Dorsal Distal Radial, Radial, and Ulnar Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Ultrasound Guidance in Acute Myocardial Infarction.超声引导下经皮桡动脉、尺动脉和掌侧桡动脉穿刺冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Jun;46(6):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100822. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Outcomes of transulnar and transradial percutaneous coronary intervention using ultrasound guided access in patients selected based on an ultrasound algorithm.基于超声算法选择的患者行经皮桡动脉和尺动脉超声引导入路的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Indian Heart J. 2021 May-Jun;73(3):362-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
Procedural Outcomes With Femoral, Radial, Distal Radial, and Ulnar Access for Coronary Angiography: A Network Meta-Analysis.经股动脉、桡动脉、远端桡动脉和尺动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的操作结果:一项网状 Meta 分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;17(9):e014186. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014186. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Systematic review of alternative access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: Dorsal distal radial and ulnar artery catheterization.经桡动脉和尺动脉逆行入路行心导管术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的系统评价:远端背侧桡动脉和尺动脉入路。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):706-713. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28398. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗患者前臂动脉的超声评估:一年随访结果
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(7):502-10. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0029.
6
Evolving Techniques to Improve Radial/Ulnar Artery Access: Crossover Rate of 0.3% in 1,000 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via the Wrist.改善桡动脉/尺动脉穿刺的技术进展:1000例连续接受经腕部心脏导管插入术和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的交叉率为0.3%。
J Interv Cardiol. 2015 Aug;28(4):396-404. doi: 10.1111/joic.12213.
7
Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮心脏导管插入术尺动脉入路的安全性和有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1273-1280. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27479. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review.经尺动脉心脏导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:技术、与经桡动脉的比较、解剖学考量及文献综述
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1126-1134. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27220. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
10
Current alternatives to traditional radial approach for coronary interventions: A randomized prospective study of the ulnar and distal radial approaches.冠状动脉介入治疗中传统桡动脉入路的当前替代方法:尺动脉和桡动脉远心端入路的随机前瞻性研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jul;104(1):44-53. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31071. Epub 2024 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prevalence of Difficult Vascular Anatomy in Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Cardiac Catheterization in Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts.倾向评分匹配队列中经尺动脉与经桡动脉途径行心脏导管插入术时困难血管解剖结构的发生率
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;8(7):e71037. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71037. eCollection 2025 Jul.