Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1806-1817. doi: 10.1177/17470218211008406. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
In a conjoint memory task (measuring repetition priming, recognition memory, and source memory), items recognised as previously studied and receiving correct source decisions also tend to show a greater magnitude of the repetition priming effect. These associations have been explained as arising from a single memory system or signal, rather than multiple distinct ones. In the present work, we examine whether the association between priming and source memory can alternatively be explained as being driven by recognition or fluency. We first reproduced the basic priming-source association (Experiment 1). In Experiments 2 and 3, we found that the association persisted even when the task was modified so that overt and covert recognition judgements were precluded. In Experiment 4, the association was again present even though fluency (as measured by identification response time) could not influence the source decision, although the association was notably weaker. These findings suggest that the association between priming and source memory is not attributable to a contribution of recognition or fluency; instead, the findings are consistent with a single-system account in which a common memory signal drives responding.
在联合记忆任务(测量重复启动、识别记忆和来源记忆)中,被识别为先前学习过的项目并做出正确来源判断的项目往往表现出更大的重复启动效应。这些关联被解释为来自单一的记忆系统或信号,而不是多个不同的信号。在本工作中,我们检验了启动和来源记忆之间的关联是否可以用识别或流畅性来解释。我们首先复制了基本的启动-来源关联(实验 1)。在实验 2 和实验 3 中,我们发现,即使任务被修改以排除明显和隐蔽的识别判断,这种关联仍然存在。在实验 4 中,即使流畅性(通过识别反应时间来衡量)不能影响来源判断,关联仍然存在,尽管关联明显较弱。这些发现表明,启动和来源记忆之间的关联不能归因于识别或流畅性的贡献;相反,这些发现与一个单一系统的解释一致,即一个共同的记忆信号驱动反应。