• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种能够降低感染风险并加速造口闭合伤口愈合的技术:灌洗式持续负压伤口疗法联合一期缝合。

The technique for less infectious and earlier healing of stoma closure wound: negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling followed by primary closure.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01109-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-021-01109-2
PMID:33752660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7983388/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Temporary stomas have been widely used to avoid the risk of complications such as anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. Stoma closure is relatively easy; however, postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) may be a problem. Various methods have been used to reduce the incidence of SSI. We aimed to evaluate a new technique for stoma wound closure.

METHODS

We enrolled patients who underwent stoma closure at our hospital between September 2019 and May 2020. We selected patients who lived far from our hospital and had difficulty visiting the hospital regularly and who agreed to undergo this surgical technique. We used negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling (NPWTi-d) and delayed primary closure for these patients.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent NPWTi-d and delayed primary closure without the occurrence of SSI. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days (range: 7-14 days), and the median number of days to confirmation of epithelialization was 11.5 days (range: 10-16 days).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of NPWTi-d and delayed primary closure for the stoma wound was very effective. This method may be a valuable new technique for wound management after stoma closure.

摘要

背景

结肠直肠切除术后,临时造口术被广泛用于避免吻合口漏等并发症的风险。造口关闭相对容易;然而,术后手术部位感染(SSI)可能是一个问题。已经使用了各种方法来降低 SSI 的发生率。我们旨在评估一种新的造口伤口闭合技术。

方法

我们招募了 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 5 月在我院接受造口关闭的患者。我们选择了居住在远离我们医院的地方且定期来医院就诊有困难并同意接受这种手术技术的患者。我们对这些患者使用了灌洗式和留置负压伤口治疗(NPWTi-d)和延迟一期闭合。

结果

四名患者接受 NPWTi-d 和延迟一期闭合,没有发生 SSI。术后住院中位数为 9 天(范围:7-14 天),上皮化确认的中位数天数为 11.5 天(范围:10-16 天)。

结论

NPWTi-d 和延迟一期闭合联合用于造口伤口非常有效。这种方法可能是造口关闭后伤口管理的一种有价值的新技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/807f8ecf7c29/12893_2021_1109_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/71213b106c41/12893_2021_1109_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/b2648ba8f91e/12893_2021_1109_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/81a09dbde0ad/12893_2021_1109_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/807f8ecf7c29/12893_2021_1109_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/71213b106c41/12893_2021_1109_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/b2648ba8f91e/12893_2021_1109_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/81a09dbde0ad/12893_2021_1109_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1284/7983388/807f8ecf7c29/12893_2021_1109_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The technique for less infectious and earlier healing of stoma closure wound: negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling followed by primary closure.一种能够降低感染风险并加速造口闭合伤口愈合的技术:灌洗式持续负压伤口疗法联合一期缝合。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01109-2.
2
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling after stoma closure: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis.负压伤口治疗联合灌洗在造口关闭后的效果:回顾性和倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05016-1.
3
The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomised control study (SR-PICO study).负压伤口疗法在造口反转术后伤口愈合中的疗效:一项随机对照研究(SR-PICO 研究)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3925-z.
4
Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.荷包缝合关闭造口部位可减少伤口感染:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Nov;57(11):1282-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000209.
5
A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal.前瞻性研究“环形荷包缝合”与造口反转中的原发性线性皮肤缝合的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Aug 17;42:287. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.287.29213. eCollection 2022.
6
[Gunsight closure versus purse-string closure techniques in loop stoma reversal: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial].回肠造口还纳术中瞄准器闭合术与荷包缝合闭合术的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 1;58(8):608-613. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200421-00315.
7
Pursestring Closure versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rate: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.造口回纳术后荷包缝合与传统一期缝合以降低手术部位感染率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):808-15. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000401.
8
Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.荷包缝合术与带引流管的一期缝合术用于造口回纳手术的比较:一项随机临床试验的结果
Surg Today. 2019 Mar;49(3):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1729-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy in elective stoma reversal surgery: results of a UK district general hospital pilot.择期肠造口还纳术中应用负压伤口治疗的效果:英国一家地区综合医院的试点研究结果。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Mar;104(3):332-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time in the wound management of necrotizing fasciitis.负压伤口治疗联合滴注及停留时间在坏死性筋膜炎伤口管理中的应用
J Tissue Viability. 2021 May;30(2):262-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of subcutaneous closed suction drain in the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure: a retrospective observational study.皮内缝合荷包关闭式回肠袢式造口还纳术后应用皮下密闭式负压引流预防切口手术部位感染的效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02549-2.
2
Risk factor for the development of surgical site infection following ileostomy reversal: a single-center report.回肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染的危险因素:单中心报告。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1675-1682. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01335-0. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.负压伤口疗法与传统伤口处理在皮下腹部伤口愈合障碍中的比较:SAWHI 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414.
2
The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomised control study (SR-PICO study).负压伤口疗法在造口反转术后伤口愈合中的疗效:一项随机对照研究(SR-PICO 研究)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3925-z.
3
A protocol for skin closure after stoma reversal.
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling after stoma closure: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis.
负压伤口治疗联合灌洗在造口关闭后的效果:回顾性和倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05016-1.
造口回纳术后皮肤闭合方案。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):255-257. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02033-7. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for complications after loop ileostomy closure.回肠袢式造口关闭术后并发症危险因素的多因素分析。
Cir Cir. 2019;87(3):337-346. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.18000611.
5
Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.荷包缝合术与带引流管的一期缝合术用于造口回纳手术的比较:一项随机临床试验的结果
Surg Today. 2019 Mar;49(3):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1729-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy at Ostomy Closure for the Prevention of Delayed Wound Healing and Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.预防性负压伤口治疗在溃疡性结肠炎患者造口闭合术中预防伤口愈合延迟和手术部位感染的随机对照试验
Dig Surg. 2016;33(6):449-54. doi: 10.1159/000446550. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Clinical recommendations and practical guide for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.负压伤口灌注治疗的临床建议与实践指南
Int Wound J. 2016 Apr;13(2):159-74. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12452. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Clinical trial on the incidence of wound infection and patient satisfaction after stoma closure: comparison of two skin closure techniques.造口关闭术后伤口感染发生率及患者满意度的临床试验:两种皮肤关闭技术的比较
Ann Coloproctol. 2015 Feb;31(1):29-33. doi: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.29. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
9
Surgical site infections (SSIs) after stoma reversal (SR): risk factors, implications, and protective strategies.造口回纳术后的手术部位感染(SSIs):危险因素、影响及预防策略
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Feb;19(2):327-34. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2649-3. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
10
Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study.四种皮肤闭合技术后造口部位手术部位感染的患病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Dig Surg. 2014;31(2):73-8. doi: 10.1159/000354426. Epub 2014 Apr 23.