Suppr超能文献

围手术期儿科患者睡眠障碍性呼吸或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查工具的选择。

Selection of Screening Tool for Sleep-Disordered Breathing or Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pediatric Patients in the Perianesthesia Setting.

机构信息

Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Pediatric Surgery, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA.

Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Pediatric Surgery, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA.

出版信息

J Perianesth Nurs. 2021 Aug;36(4):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.09.006. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to select an appropriate tool to predict risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among pediatric patients in the preoperative setting.

DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective chart review and a survey of nursing staff to compare two tools that were determined to be valid in assessing risk of OSA and postanesthesia complications in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years was conducted. About 300 pediatric patients presenting for elective surgery were screened for OSA using STBUR (Snoring, Trouble Breathing during sleep, struggling to Breathe during Sleep, and waking UnRefreshed) and ST(1)OP-BANG (Snoring, Tonsillar hypertrophy, sleep Obstruction, BMI, Age, Neuromuscular disorders, and Genetic/congenital deformities) concurrently. Six preoperative nurses were then surveyed to compare ease of use and time to complete the screening tools.

FINDINGS

The STBUR tool was found to predict complications in 37.5% patients versus 22.7% patients with the pediatric ST(1)OP-BANG. Nursing staff found that although both tools were quick and easy to use, the STBUR tool was easier for parents to answer.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a screening tool to help predict risk of OSA and postanesthetic complications also helps to dictate anesthesia technique, nursing staffing requirements, and plans of care for postoperative management of pediatric patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在选择一种合适的工具,以预测术前小儿患者发生阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的风险。

方法/设计:对护理人员进行回顾性病历审查和调查,以比较两种工具,这两种工具被确定为在评估 6 个月至 18 岁小儿患者 OSA 风险和麻醉后并发症方面是有效的。约 300 名接受择期手术的小儿患者同时使用 STBUR(打鼾、睡眠中呼吸困难、睡眠中呼吸困难、醒来未恢复)和 ST(1)OP-BANG(打鼾、扁桃体肥大、睡眠障碍、BMI、年龄、神经肌肉疾病和遗传/先天畸形)进行 OSA 筛查。然后对 6 名术前护士进行调查,以比较使用筛查工具的难易程度和完成筛查所需的时间。

结果

STBUR 工具预测并发症的发生率为 37.5%,而小儿 ST(1)OP-BANG 的预测并发症发生率为 22.7%。护理人员发现,虽然两种工具都快速易用,但 STBUR 工具更便于家长回答。

结论

使用筛查工具来帮助预测 OSA 和麻醉后并发症的风险,也有助于决定麻醉技术、护理人员配备要求以及小儿患者术后管理的护理计划。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验