• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

≥65 岁患者行门诊肩关节置换术安全吗?住院和门诊环境下再入院和并发症的比较。

Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe in patients aged ≥65 years? A comparison of readmissions and complications in inpatient and outpatient settings.

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2306-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.022
PMID:33753272
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate that outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is cost-effective and may have a low complication rate similar to inpatient TSA. However, existing studies have included younger patient cohorts who typically possess fewer medical comorbidities. Patients aged ≥65 years are commonly enrolled in Medicare, which has traditionally designated TSA as an inpatient-only procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical complication rates and 90-day readmission rates between inpatient and outpatient TSA performed in adults aged ≥65 years.

METHODS

Medical records for all patients aged ≥65 years who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA by a single surgeon from July 2015 to May 2020 were reviewed. Patients were preselected for outpatient or inpatient surgery based on lack of significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities and patient preference. Demographics, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were collected in addition to emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions within 90 days of the index surgery. Relationships among frequency and types of complications and surgical setting (inpatients vs. outpatient) were assessed. Complication rates and demographic variables between inpatient and outpatient procedures were compared. Logistic regressions were performed to account for interacting predictor variables on the odds of having complications.

RESULTS

A total of 145 shoulders (138 patients; 95 male, 43 female) were included in the analysis, of which 98 received inpatient TSA and 47 received outpatient TSA. Average age was 75.5 ± 7.2 for inpatient TSA and 70.5 ± 4.5 for outpatient TSA (P < .001). Patient age (P < .001), ASA score ≥3 (P < .001), and reverse TSA (P = .002) were significantly positively correlated with receiving inpatient surgery. There were 16 complications (16.3%) in the inpatient group and 9 complications (19.1%) in the outpatient group (P = .648). There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications, return to the ED, or reoperations between inpatient and outpatient procedures (P > .05). Each 1-year increase in age increased the predicted odds of having a surgical complication by 14% (odds ratio = 1.14; P = .021), irrespective of surgical setting. Those who underwent inpatient TSA had a significantly higher frequency of 90-day readmission (inpatient=16, outpatient=1; P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative complications and ED returns were not significantly different between inpatient and outpatient TSA. Each 1-year increase in age increased the odds of postoperative surgical complications by 14%, regardless of surgical setting. Outpatient TSA was found to be safe for appropriately selected patients aged ≥65 years, and re-evaluation of TSA as an inpatient-only procedure should be considered.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,门诊全肩关节置换术(TSA)具有成本效益,并且可能具有与住院 TSA 相似的低并发症发生率。然而,现有研究包括了年龄较小的患者,他们通常患有较少的合并症。年龄≥65 岁的患者通常参加医疗保险,医疗保险通常将 TSA 指定为仅住院手术。本研究的目的是比较≥65 岁成年人进行的门诊和住院 TSA 的手术并发症发生率和 90 天再入院率。

方法

回顾了 2015 年 7 月至 2020 年 5 月期间由一名外科医生为≥65 岁的患者进行的原发性解剖或反向 TSA 的所有患者的病历。根据是否存在显著的心肺合并症和患者偏好,患者被预先选择接受门诊或住院手术。除了急诊就诊和索引手术后 90 天内的再入院外,还收集了人口统计学、体重指数(BMI)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分。评估了并发症的频率和类型与手术环境(住院 vs. 门诊)之间的关系。比较了住院和门诊手术的并发症发生率和人口统计学变量。进行逻辑回归以解释预测变量对并发症发生概率的相互作用。

结果

共有 145 个肩膀(138 名患者;95 名男性,43 名女性)被纳入分析,其中 98 例接受了住院 TSA,47 例接受了门诊 TSA。住院 TSA 的平均年龄为 75.5±7.2 岁,门诊 TSA 的平均年龄为 70.5±4.5 岁(P<0.001)。患者年龄(P<0.001)、ASA 评分≥3(P<0.001)和反向 TSA(P=0.002)与接受住院手术显著正相关。住院组有 16 例(16.3%)并发症,门诊组有 9 例(19.1%)并发症(P=0.648)。住院和门诊手术之间的术后并发症、返回急诊就诊和再次手术的频率没有显著差异(P>0.05)。年龄每增加 1 年,手术并发症的预测概率增加 14%(优势比=1.14;P=0.021),与手术环境无关。接受住院 TSA 的患者 90 天内再入院的频率显著较高(住院=16,门诊=1;P=0.034)。

结论

门诊和住院 TSA 之间的术后并发症和急诊就诊返回没有显著差异。年龄每增加 1 年,手术并发症的概率增加 14%,无论手术环境如何。发现门诊 TSA 对年龄≥65 岁的适当选择的患者是安全的,应重新评估 TSA 作为仅住院手术的适应证。

相似文献

1
Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe in patients aged ≥65 years? A comparison of readmissions and complications in inpatient and outpatient settings.≥65 岁患者行门诊肩关节置换术安全吗?住院和门诊环境下再入院和并发症的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2306-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Comparative outcomes of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the Medicare dataset.门诊与住院全肩关节置换术的比较结果:对医疗保险数据集的分析
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):934-938. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-0976.R1.
3
Trends and outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty after its removal from CMS's inpatient-only list.全肩关节置换术从美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的仅限住院治疗清单中移除后的门诊全肩关节置换术的趋势和结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Predicting successful outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.预测门诊全肩关节置换术的成功。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jul;32(7):1357-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.131. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors.COVID-19 时代的门诊肩关节置换术:90 天内的并发症和危险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.034. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based study comparing adverse event and readmission rates to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.门诊全肩关节置换术:一项基于人群的研究,比较不良事件和再入院率与住院全肩关节置换术的情况。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov;25(11):1780-1786. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
7
Inpatient versus outpatient shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: A propensity score matched risk-adjusted analysis demonstrates the safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.住院与门诊肩关节置换术的结果比较:倾向评分匹配风险调整分析证明了门诊肩关节置换术的安全性。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Apr;7(2):51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Does Not Increase the 90-Day Risk of Complications Compared With Inpatient Surgery in Prescreened Patients.与住院手术相比,门诊全肩关节置换术不会增加经预筛选患者90天并发症风险。
Orthopedics. 2018 Jul 1;41(4):e563-e568. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180524-04. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Hospital Readmission Rates Following Outpatient Versus Inpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty.门诊与住院肩关节置换术后的再入院率。
Orthopedics. 2021 Mar-Apr;44(2):e173-e177. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200925-03. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Patient outcomes after revision total shoulder arthroplasty in an inpatient vs. outpatient setting.住院与门诊环境下全肩关节置换翻修术后的患者预后。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jan;32(1):82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.门诊肩关节置换术:关于临床结局和成本效益的最新系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Jun 25:17585732251349754. doi: 10.1177/17585732251349754.
2
Outpatient vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: complication rates, clinical outcomes, and eligibility parameters.门诊与住院全肩关节置换术:并发症发生率、临床结果及适应证参数
JSES Int. 2023 Aug 22;8(3):483-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.029. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Identifying risk factors for 30-day readmission after outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty to aid in patient selection.
确定门诊全肩关节置换术后30天再入院的危险因素,以辅助患者选择。
JSES Int. 2023 Jul 17;7(6):2425-2432. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.015. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Prospective cohort study of same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty in patients of 85 years and younger.85岁及以下患者当日出院肩关节置换术的前瞻性队列研究。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Sep;15(1 Suppl):80-86. doi: 10.1177/17585732221113503. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
5
Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors.COVID-19 时代的门诊肩关节置换术:90 天内的并发症和危险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.034. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis of 20,035 procedures.门诊与住院解剖型全肩关节置换术的比较:对20,035例手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 15;6(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.015. eCollection 2022 Jan.