• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非目标情绪刺激必须高度显著,才能调节注意瞬脱。

Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Fred J. Heyne Building, Room 126, 3695 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1971-1991. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x
PMID:33754297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984507/
Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) is often considered a top-down phenomenon because it is triggered by matching an initial target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream to a search template. However, the AB is modulated when targets are emotional, and is evoked when a task-irrelevant, emotional critical distractor (CDI) replaces T1. Neither manipulation fully captures the interplay between bottom-up and top-down attention in the AB: Valenced targets intrinsically conflate top-down and bottom-up attention. The CDI approach cannot manipulate second target (T2) valence, which is critical because valenced T2s can "break through" the AB (in the target-manipulation approach). The present research resolves this methodological challenge by indirectly measuring whether a purely bottom-up CDI can modulate report of a subsequent T2. This novel approach adds a valenced CDI to the "classic," two-target AB. Participants viewed RSVP streams containing a T1-CDI pair preceding a variable lag to T2. If the CDI's valence is sufficient to survive the AB, it should modulate T2 performance, indirectly signaling bottom-up capture by an emotional stimulus. Contrary to this prediction, CDI valence only affected the AB when CDIs were also extremely visually conspicuous. Thus, emotional valence alone is insufficient to modulate the AB.

摘要

注意瞬脱(AB)通常被认为是一种自上而下的现象,因为它是由在快速连续视觉呈现(RSVP)流中匹配初始目标(T1)与搜索模板来触发的。然而,当目标是情绪性的时,AB 会被调节,并且当一个与任务无关的、情绪性的关键分心物(CDI)取代 T1 时,AB 会被唤起。这两种操作都不能完全捕捉到 AB 中自上而下和自下而上注意力之间的相互作用:有情绪的目标本质上使自上而下和自下而上的注意力混合在一起。CDI 方法不能操纵第二个目标(T2)的情绪,这一点至关重要,因为有情绪的 T2 可以“突破”AB(在目标操作方法中)。本研究通过间接测量一个纯粹的自下而上的 CDI 是否可以调节随后的 T2 的报告,解决了这一方法学挑战。这种新方法在“经典”的双目标 AB 中增加了一个有情绪的 CDI。参与者观看包含 T1-CDI 对的 RSVP 流,在 T2 之前有一个可变的滞后。如果 CDI 的情绪足以在 AB 中幸存下来,它应该会调节 T2 的表现,这间接表明情绪刺激引起了自下而上的捕获。与这一预测相反,只有当 CDI 极其明显可见时,CDI 的情绪才会影响 AB。因此,情绪效价本身不足以调节 AB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/38eb5a94fe72/13414_2021_2260_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/0a554d86a114/13414_2021_2260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/8ff1172481b2/13414_2021_2260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/c34a2c93bc7c/13414_2021_2260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/60c1a4d16f2d/13414_2021_2260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/32f8ed509684/13414_2021_2260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/1eab699b1ebc/13414_2021_2260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/fd2084c7eff8/13414_2021_2260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/020f4910dc30/13414_2021_2260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/c2cfd6cdcba0/13414_2021_2260_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/a7dbda5bcba7/13414_2021_2260_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/ffca7e594ed7/13414_2021_2260_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/38eb5a94fe72/13414_2021_2260_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/0a554d86a114/13414_2021_2260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/8ff1172481b2/13414_2021_2260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/c34a2c93bc7c/13414_2021_2260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/60c1a4d16f2d/13414_2021_2260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/32f8ed509684/13414_2021_2260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/1eab699b1ebc/13414_2021_2260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/fd2084c7eff8/13414_2021_2260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/020f4910dc30/13414_2021_2260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/c2cfd6cdcba0/13414_2021_2260_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/a7dbda5bcba7/13414_2021_2260_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/ffca7e594ed7/13414_2021_2260_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/160f/7984507/38eb5a94fe72/13414_2021_2260_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink.非目标情绪刺激必须高度显著,才能调节注意瞬脱。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1971-1991. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02260-x. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.不仅仅是感觉:情绪性注意瞬脱依赖于非情绪性的“突出”,但与注意瞬脱相比较弱。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1034-1053. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02677-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Fearful expressions of rapidly presented hybrid-faces modulate the lag 1 sparing in the attentional blink.快速呈现的混合面孔的恐惧表情调节了注意瞬脱中的滞后 1 节省。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103124. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103124. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
4
Right visual-field advantage in the attentional blink: Asymmetry in attentional gating across time and space.注意瞬脱中的右视野优势:跨时间和空间的注意门控不对称性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):1979-1992. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1356-z.
5
Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink.干扰抑制可预测注意瞬脱中的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2008 Oct 3;3(10):e3330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003330.
6
Spatial distribution of emotional attentional blink under top-down attentional control.情绪注意瞬脱的自上而下注意控制下的空间分布。
Cogn Process. 2023 Feb;24(1):153-159. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01109-x. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
On the role of intervening distractors in the attentional blink.关于干预性干扰物在注意瞬脱中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):42-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0003-8.
8
Effect of emotions on temporal attention.情绪对时间注意力的影响。
Prog Brain Res. 2017;236:287-309. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
9
The impact of emotional faces on younger and older adults' attentional blink.情绪面孔对年轻和年长成年人注意瞬脱的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1436-1447. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1573719. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
10
The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink.预目标干扰流属性对骨骼注意瞬脱的影响。
Neuroreport. 2014 Mar 26;25(5):330-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000098.

引用本文的文献

1
Crisis-related stimuli do not increase the emotional attentional blink in a general university student population.危机相关刺激并不会增加普通大学生群体的情绪性注意瞬脱。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jan 8;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00525-7.
2
jsQuestPlus: A JavaScript implementation of the QUEST+ method for estimating psychometric function parameters in online experiments.jsQuestPlus:一种用于在线实验中估计心理测量函数参数的 QUEST+ 方法的 JavaScript 实现。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3179-3186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01948-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
2
Pre-target oscillatory brain activity and the attentional blink.目标前振荡性脑活动与注意瞬脱
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3583-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4418-2. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
The Rapid Perceptual Impact of Emotional Distractors.情绪干扰因素的快速感知影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129320. eCollection 2015.
4
Unexpected abrupt onsets can override a top-down set for color.意外的突然发作可能会推翻自上而下的颜色设定。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1153-65. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000084. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
5
Functional fractionation of the stimulus-driven attention network.刺激驱动注意力网络的功能分离。
J Neurosci. 2014 May 14;34(20):6958-69. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4975-13.2014.
6
Temporal-spatial neural activation patterns linked to perceptual encoding of emotional salience.与情绪显著性的知觉编码相关的时空间神经激活模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e93753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093753. eCollection 2014.
7
How does emotional content affect lexical processing?情感内容如何影响词汇加工?
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(4):737-46. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.851068. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
Affective orientation influences memory for emotional and neutral words.情感取向会影响对情感性和中性词汇的记忆。
Am J Psychol. 2012 Spring;125(1):71-80. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.1.0071.
9
The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.注意力对情绪的动态分配:晚期正电位和稳态视觉诱发电位的同时且独立证据。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
10
Task relevance modulates processing of distracting emotional stimuli.任务相关性调节分心情绪刺激的加工。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(1):42-52. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.567055. Epub 2011 May 23.