Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Associate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Dec;91(4):1249-1274. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12415. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
The physical education (PE) teacher is a decisive factor for PE development and teaching. Reflecting on and making the best possible use of the PE teachers' personal resources positively influence teacher effectiveness and student achievement. This requires a comprehensive analysis of PE teachers' personal characteristics.
Consequently, this study aimed to describe PE teachers by using an aggregated examination of PE teachers' synergistic personal characteristics and analysing gender, age, and school type differences.
1,163 German PE teachers (61.9% female; M = 43.16 ± 10.8 years) from six different school types participated in the study.
Participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing PE teachers' General Personality Traits, General Interests, and Motivational Characteristics (Teacher Self-Efficacy, Enthusiasm, and Interests). Descriptive analyses, between subjects MANOVAs, and univariate ANOVAs with pairwise multiple comparison tests were applied.
Multivariate gender differences occurred for General Personality Traits (η = .04), General Interests (η = .07), and Motivational Characteristics (η = .03); age differences for General Personality Traits (η = .03); school type differences for General Personality Traits (η = .05); and Motivational Characteristics (η = .11). Considering individual dimensions, gender revealed most univariate differences, especially in General Personality Traits and General Interests. School types revealed most univariate differences in Motivational Characteristics.
The educational personnel can (1) make use of the PE teachers' general stable factors by aligning teaching accordingly, for example considering teachers' gender and (2) specifically foster PE teacher personal development regarding Motivational Characteristics by, for example adapting teacher education or professional training to the particular school type.
体育教师是体育发展和教学的决定性因素。反思和充分利用体育教师的个人资源会积极影响教师的效能和学生的成就。这需要对体育教师的个人特征进行全面分析。
因此,本研究旨在通过综合考察体育教师协同的个人特征,分析性别、年龄和学校类型差异来描述体育教师。
来自六种不同学校类型的 1163 名德国体育教师(61.9%为女性;M=43.16±10.8 岁)参与了这项研究。
参与者完成了自我报告问卷,评估体育教师的一般人格特质、一般兴趣和激励特征(教师自我效能感、热情和兴趣)。采用描述性分析、被试间多元方差分析和单变量方差分析及多重比较检验。
在一般人格特质(η=0.04)、一般兴趣(η=0.07)和激励特征(η=0.03)方面存在多元性别差异;在一般人格特质方面存在年龄差异(η=0.03);在一般人格特质方面存在学校类型差异(η=0.05)和激励特征差异(η=0.11)。考虑到个别维度,性别在一般人格特质和一般兴趣方面显示出最多的单变量差异。学校类型在激励特征方面显示出最多的单变量差异。
教育人员可以(1)通过相应的教学来利用体育教师的一般稳定因素,例如考虑教师的性别,(2)通过例如调整教师教育或专业培训来适应特定的学校类型,特别促进体育教师的个人发展。