Triapitsyn Serguei V, Baquero Enrique, Rugman-Jones Paul F
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California, 92521, USA..
Zootaxa. 2021 Mar 10;4941(4):zootaxa.4941.4.9. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4941.4.9.
Soyka (1946) described the European fairyfly species Anagrus bakkendorfi Soyka (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from a single female collected on the same day, 7.x.1931, together with several non-type specimens incorrectly labeled as paratypes (Chiappini Triapitsyn 1999), on a window at its type locality, the former St. Ignatius Jesuit College in Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands. Soyka (1956) did not mention type specimens of any of his species of Anagrus Haliday. He described Anagrus avalae Soyka (Soyka 1956) based apparently on a specimen collected on Mt. Avala, Belgrade, Serbia, former Yugoslavia, along with several other nominal species (some also from Valkenburg) that were later synonymized with A. avalae and A. bakkendorfi by Chiappini (1989) and Chiappini Triapitsyn (1999). The only, minor, morphological difference between the two nominal species is the length of the ovipositor in females relative to the length of the protibia, being at least 2.6× in A. bakkendorfi and at most 2.3× in A. avalae (Triapitsyn 2015). Specimens identifiable as both species were captured by the second author in 2000 by a Malaise trap in Iratibizkar, Irati Forest (Selva de Irati), Navarra, Spain. Chiappini Triapitsyn (1999) discussed both nominal species but despite recognizing their apparent conspecificity, no formal synonymy was proposed. Triapitsyn Berezovskiy (2004) and Triapitsyn (2015) also did not propose synonymy because at that time genetic evidence for conspecificity was lacking. However, Triapitsyn et al. (2019) obtained DNA and sequenced selected mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal gene regions (COI and ITS2) from a specimen unambiguously identified by the first author as A. avalae that was collected in Sevenoaks, Kent County, England, United Kingdom. Because of this we decided to collect fresh specimens identifiable as A. bakkendorfi for molecular analysis and genetic comparison with those identifiable as A. avalae. Based on the previous record (Triapitsyn 2015), several females of A. bakkendorfi were successfully captured by the second author on 4.ix.2020 in Irati Forest, preserved in ethanol, and shipped to the first and third authors for morphological and molecular identification, respectively.
索伊卡(1946年)描述了欧洲仙女蜂物种——巴肯多夫氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂(Anagrus bakkendorfi Soyka),该物种基于1931年7月7日采集的一只雌性标本,采集地点为其模式产地——荷兰林堡省瓦尔肯堡的前圣伊格内修斯耶稣会学院的一扇窗户上,同时采集的还有几只被错误标记为副模式标本的非模式标本(基亚皮尼·特里亚皮琴,1999年)。索伊卡(1956年)未提及他所描述的任何阿纳格罗仙女蜂物种的模式标本。他描述的阿瓦莱氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂(Anagrus avalae Soyka)显然基于在塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德阿瓦拉山采集的一个标本,前南斯拉夫,同时还有其他几个名义物种(有些也来自瓦尔肯堡),后来基亚皮尼(1989年)和基亚皮尼·特里亚皮琴(1999年)将它们同义于阿瓦莱氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂和巴肯多夫氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂。这两个名义物种之间唯一微小的形态差异是雌性产卵器的长度相对于前胫节的长度,在巴肯多夫氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂中至少为2.6倍,在阿瓦莱氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂中最多为2.3倍(特里亚皮琴,2015年)。2000年,第二作者在西班牙纳瓦拉省伊拉蒂森林(伊拉蒂塞尔瓦)的伊拉蒂比兹卡尔通过马氏网诱捕器捕获了可鉴定为这两个物种的标本。基亚皮尼·特里亚皮琴(1999年)讨论了这两个名义物种,但尽管认识到它们明显为同种,但未提出正式的同义关系。特里亚皮琴·别列佐夫斯基(2004年)和特里亚皮琴(2015年)也未提出同义关系,因为当时缺乏同种的遗传证据。然而,特里亚皮琴等人(2019年)从第一作者明确鉴定为阿瓦莱氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂的一个标本中获取了DNA,并对选定的线粒体和核糖体基因区域(COI和ITS2)进行了测序,该标本采集于英国肯特郡七橡树。因此,我们决定采集可鉴定为巴肯多夫氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂的新鲜标本进行分子分析,并与可鉴定为阿瓦莱氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂的标本进行遗传比较。根据之前的记录(特里亚皮琴,2015年),2020年9月4日,第二作者在伊拉蒂森林成功捕获了几只巴肯多夫氏阿纳格罗仙女蜂的雌性,保存在乙醇中,并分别运往第一和第三作者处进行形态学和分子鉴定。