Hospital HM Nens. HM Hospitales, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;333:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Criteria to define aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are different for children and adults. The objective of this study was to find the best reference tool to define dilation of the aortic root (AR) and the ascending aorta (AA) in BAV adolescents with an adult body surface area (BSA).
Patients recruited were ≥10-years-old with a BSA ≥1.5 m2. Three measurements of the AR and AA were compared: z-score, the BSA-indexed value (BSA-IV) and the absolute value (AV), with thresholds in +2/+3, 21 mm/m2 and 40 mm, respectively.
231 subjects were collected from the Pediatric REVAB database, with a median age and BSA of 14-year-old and 1.67 m2. Significant differences were reported in the AA: 109 (47%) patients had a z-score ≥2 and 67 (29%) a Z ≥ 3, but only 9 (3%) a BSA-IV ≥21 mm/m2 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01) and 2 (0.9%) an AV ≥40 mm (p = 0.22 and p = 0.08).
Our results indicate that in the AA there are a significant number of patients in which it would be recommendable changing to BSA-IV when children are older than 10-year-old and BSA ≥1.5 m2. Regarding the AR, criteria for dilatation seems not to be influenced by the reference chosen.
二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)患者主动脉扩张的定义标准在儿童和成人之间有所不同。本研究的目的是寻找最佳参考工具,以定义具有成人体表面积(BSA)的 BAV 青少年的主动脉根部(AR)和升主动脉(AA)扩张。
招募的患者年龄均≥10 岁,BSA≥1.5m2。比较了 AR 和 AA 的三种测量值:z 评分、BSA 指数值(BSA-IV)和绝对值(AV),阈值分别为+2/+3、21mm/m2和 40mm。
从儿科 REVAB 数据库中收集了 231 名受试者,中位数年龄和 BSA 分别为 14 岁和 1.67m2。AA 存在显著差异:109 名(47%)患者的 z 评分≥2,67 名(29%)的 Z≥3,但只有 9 名(3%)的 BSA-IV≥21mm/m2(p<0.01 和 p<0.01)和 2 名(0.9%)的 AV≥40mm(p=0.22 和 p=0.08)。
我们的结果表明,在 AA 中,当儿童年龄大于 10 岁且 BSA≥1.5m2 时,建议将 z 评分≥2 的患者改用 BSA-IV。对于 AR,扩张标准似乎不受所选参考值的影响。