Dennis-Tiwary Tracy A, Roy Amy Krain, Denefrio Samantha, Myruski Sarah
Hunter College, The City University of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY.
The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, Department of Psychology, New York, NY.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep 1;7(5):879-899. doi: 10.1177/2167702619838474. Epub 2019 May 14.
The anxiety-related attention bias (AB) has been studied for several decades as a clinically-relevant output of the dynamic and complex threat detection-response system. Despite research enthusiasm for the construct of AB, current theories and measurement approaches cannot adequately account for the growing body of mixed, contradictory, and null findings. Drawing on clinical, neuroscience, and animal models, we argue that the apparent complexity and contradictions in the empirical literature can be attributed to the field's failure to clearly conceptualize AB heterogeneity and the dearth of studies in AB that consider additional cognitive mechanisms in anxiety, particularly disruptions in threat-safety discrimination and cognitive control. We review existing research and propose a working model of AB heterogeneity positing that AB may be best conceptualized as multiple subtypes of dysregulated processing of and attention to threat anchored in individual differences in threat-safety discrimination and cognitive control. We review evidence for this working model and discuss how it can be used to advance knowledge of AB mechanisms and inform personalized prevention and intervention approaches.
几十年来,焦虑相关的注意偏向(AB)一直作为动态复杂威胁检测 - 反应系统的临床相关输出进行研究。尽管对AB结构的研究热情高涨,但当前的理论和测量方法无法充分解释越来越多的混合、矛盾和无效的研究结果。借鉴临床、神经科学和动物模型,我们认为实证文献中明显的复杂性和矛盾可归因于该领域未能清晰地概念化AB异质性,以及AB研究中缺乏考虑焦虑中其他认知机制的研究,特别是威胁 - 安全辨别和认知控制的破坏。我们回顾现有研究并提出一个AB异质性的工作模型,假定AB最好被概念化为威胁处理和注意失调的多种亚型,这些亚型基于威胁 - 安全辨别和认知控制的个体差异。我们回顾了支持这个工作模型的证据,并讨论了它如何用于推进AB机制的知识,并为个性化预防和干预方法提供信息。