• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算建模应用于点探测任务可提高可靠性和机制见解。

Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;85(7):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022
PMID:30449531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420394/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biased patterns of attention are implicated as key mechanisms across many forms of psychopathology and have given rise to automated mechanistic interventions designed to modify such attentional preferences. However, progress is substantially hindered by limitations in widely used methods to quantify attention, bias leading to imprecision of measurement.

METHODS

In a sample of patients who were clinically anxious (n = 70), we applied a well-validated form of computational modeling (drift-diffusion model) to trial-level reaction time data from a two-choice "dot-probe task"-the dominant paradigm used in hundreds of attention bias studies to date-in order to model distinct components of task performance.

RESULTS

While drift-diffusion model-derived attention bias indices exhibited convergent validity with previous approaches (e.g., conventional bias scores, eye tracking), our novel analytic approach yielded substantially improved split-half reliability, modestly improved test-retest reliability, and revealed novel mechanistic insights regarding neural substrates of attention bias and the impact of an automated attention retraining procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Computational modeling of attention bias task data may represent a new way forward to improve precision.

摘要

背景

在许多形式的精神病理学中,注意力的偏向模式被认为是关键机制,并由此产生了旨在改变这种注意力偏好的自动化机械干预措施。然而,由于广泛使用的注意力定量方法存在局限性,导致测量精度不高,这在很大程度上阻碍了进展。

方法

在一组临床焦虑的患者(n=70)中,我们应用了一种经过充分验证的计算建模方法(漂移-扩散模型),对来自二选一“点探测任务”的试验水平反应时间数据进行分析,该任务是迄今为止数百项注意力偏向研究中使用的主要范式,用于对任务表现的不同成分进行建模。

结果

虽然漂移-扩散模型得出的注意力偏向指数与之前的方法(例如,传统的偏向得分、眼动追踪)具有收敛效度,但我们新颖的分析方法大大提高了分半信度,适度提高了重测信度,并揭示了关于注意力偏向的神经基础以及自动化注意力再训练程序的影响的新的机制见解。

结论

对注意力偏向任务数据的计算建模可能代表着提高精度的新途径。

相似文献

1
Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.计算建模应用于点探测任务可提高可靠性和机制见解。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;85(7):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.使用点探测任务进行扩展测试可提高重测信度和效度。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0886-1. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
3
Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.使用基于反应的计算方法改善点探测注意力测量的心理测量特性。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;60:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices.食物注意偏向的重测信度:稳健的眼动追踪和反应时指标。
Appetite. 2019 May 1;136:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
5
Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.智能手机生态瞬时评估视觉点探测注意偏向威胁指标的可靠性(或缺乏可靠性)。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;82:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101918. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.评估社交焦虑障碍人群在点探测任务中注意偏向和注意偏向可变性测量的可靠性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):883-888. doi: 10.1037/pas0000912. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.注意偏向修改的 RCT 中基线偏倚的荟萃分析:临床焦虑和 PTSD 中没有指向威胁的点探测偏向的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Aug;128(6):563-573. doi: 10.1037/abn0000406.
8
Biobehavioral Markers of Attention Bias Modification in Temperamental Risk for Anxiety: A Randomized Control Trial.气质性焦虑风险的注意偏向矫正的生物行为学标记:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;57(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research.提高临床研究中点探测任务稳定性的经验性建议。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):365-76. doi: 10.1037/pas0000036. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?注意偏向威胁:危机还是机遇?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving beyond button presses to enhance the reliability of congruency tasks.超越按键操作以提高一致性任务的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 2;57(8):215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02740-0.
2
The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.情感状态在计算精神病学中的作用。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;28(8). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf049.
3
Linking attention bias to youth social anxiety and depression: Insights from computational modeling of the affective Posner task.将注意力偏差与青少年社交焦虑和抑郁联系起来:来自情感波森纳任务计算模型的见解。

本文引用的文献

1
Towards personalized, brain-based behavioral intervention for transdiagnostic anxiety: Transient neural responses to negative images predict outcomes following a targeted computer-based intervention.针对跨诊断焦虑的个性化、基于大脑的行为干预:对负性图像的短暂神经反应可预测靶向计算机干预后的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):1031-1045. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000309.
2
Computational psychiatry: a report from the 2017 NIMH workshop on opportunities and challenges.计算精神病学:2017年美国国立精神卫生研究所关于机遇与挑战研讨会的报告
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;24(4):479-483. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0063-z.
3
Affective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Nov 1;388:119764. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119764. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
4
Test-retest reliability of computational parameters versus manifest behavior for decisional flexibility in psychosis.精神病患者决策灵活性的计算参数与明显行为的重测信度
Psychol Assess. 2025 Jun-Jul;37(6-7):273-287. doi: 10.1037/pas0001383. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
5
Attention Allocation for Dysphoric Information in Adults with Depression Symptoms Using Eye-tracking and Mouse-tracking.使用眼动追踪和鼠标追踪对有抑郁症状的成年人的烦躁信息进行注意力分配
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 7;20(4):e0318923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318923. eCollection 2025.
6
No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants.在9600名参与者中,未发现情绪点探测任务的36种变体具有可靠性证据。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Mar;13(2):261-277. doi: 10.1177/21677026241253826. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of Two Computationally-Characterised Affective Bias Tasks.两项经计算表征的情感偏差任务的重测信度
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Dec 18;8(1):217-232. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.92. eCollection 2024.
8
Investigating trajectories linking social cognitive capacity, bias, and social isolation using computational modeling.使用计算模型研究连接社会认知能力、偏见和社会隔离的轨迹。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 17;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae088.
9
Reinforcement-Learning-Informed Queries Guide Behavioral Change.强化学习引导的查询指导行为改变。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;12(6):1146-1161. doi: 10.1177/21677026231213368. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
A Pilot Randomized Control Trial Testing a Smartphone-Delivered Food Attention Retraining Program in Adolescent Girls with Overweight or Obesity.一项以智能手机为媒介的食物注意力再训练程序在超重或肥胖青少年女性中进行的先导随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 12;16(20):3456. doi: 10.3390/nu16203456.
情感偏差是对奖惩统计数据的理性反应。
Elife. 2017 Oct 4;6:e27879. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27879.
4
Psychometrics and the neuroscience of individual differences: Internal consistency limits between-subjects effects.心理测量学与个体差异的神经科学:内部一致性限制了受试者间效应。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Aug;126(6):823-834. doi: 10.1037/abn0000274. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux.AFNI中的功能磁共振成像聚类:再谈假阳性率
Brain Connect. 2017 Apr;7(3):152-171. doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0475.
6
Capturing Dynamics of Biased Attention: Are New Attention Variability Measures the Way Forward?捕捉偏向性注意力的动态变化:新的注意力变异性测量方法是前进的方向吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0166600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166600. eCollection 2016.
7
Clinical Advances From a Computational Approach to Anxiety.焦虑症计算方法的临床进展
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):385-387. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias.对完成针对注意力偏差的计算机化焦虑干预的儿童和成人进行患者层面的汇总荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;50:37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.不可靠性对理解精神病理学构成的威胁:注意偏向的警示故事。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Aug;125(6):840-51. doi: 10.1037/abn0000184. Epub 2016 Jun 20.