Suhandynata Raymond T, Bevins Nicholas J, Tran Jenny T, Huang Deli, Hoffman Melissa A, Lund Kyle, Kelner Michael J, McLawhon Ronald W, Gonias Steven L, Nemazee David, Fitzgerald Robert L
Department of Pathology UC San Diego Health, San Diego CA.
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institution, San Diego, CA.
medRxiv. 2021 Mar 12:2021.03.10.21253299. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253299.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected over 110 million individuals and led to 2.5 million deaths worldwide. As more individuals are vaccinated, the clinical performance and utility of SARS-CoV-2 serology platforms needs to be evaluated.
The ability of four commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology platforms to detect previous infection or vaccination were evaluated using a cohort of 53 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients, 89 SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated healthcare workers (Pfizer or Moderna), and 127 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. Serology results were compared to a cell based SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (PSV) neutralizing antibodies assay.
The Roche S-(spike) antibody and Diazyme neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) assays detected adaptive immune response in 100.0% and 90.1% of vaccinated individuals who received two-doses of vaccine (initial and booster), respectively. The Roche N-(nucleocapsid) antibody assay and Diazyme IgG assay did not detect adaptive immune response in vaccinated individuals. The Diazyme Nabs assay correlated with the PSV SARS-CoV-2 ID50 neutralization titers (R= 0.70), while correlation of the Roche S-antibody assay was weaker (R= 0.39). Median PSV SARS-CoV-2 ID50 titers more than doubled in vaccinated individuals who received two-doses of the Moderna vaccine (ID50: 597) compared to individuals that received a single dose (ID50: 284).
The Roche S-antibody and Diazyme NAbs assays robustly detected adaptive immune responses in SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated individuals and SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. The Diazyme NAbs assay strongly correlates with the PSV SARS-CoV-2 NAbs in vaccinated individuals. Understanding the reactivity of commercially available serology platforms is important when distinguishing vaccination response versus natural infection.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)已感染超过1.1亿人,并在全球导致250万人死亡。随着越来越多的人接种疫苗,需要评估SARS-CoV-2血清学检测平台的临床性能和效用。
使用一组53名SARS-CoV-2 PCR检测呈阳性的患者、89名接种了SARS-CoV-2疫苗的医护人员(辉瑞或莫德纳疫苗)以及127名SARS-CoV-2检测呈阴性的患者,评估四种商用SARS-CoV-2血清学检测平台检测既往感染或疫苗接种情况的能力。将血清学检测结果与基于细胞的SARS-CoV-2假病毒(PSV)中和抗体检测进行比较。
罗氏S(刺突)抗体检测和Diazyme中和抗体(NAbs)检测分别在100.0%和90.1%接受两剂疫苗(初始剂量和加强剂量)的接种个体中检测到适应性免疫反应。罗氏N(核衣壳)抗体检测和Diazyme IgG检测未在接种个体中检测到适应性免疫反应。Diazyme NAbs检测与PSV SARS-CoV-2 ID50中和滴度相关(R = 0.70),而罗氏S抗体检测的相关性较弱(R = 0.39)。与接受单剂疫苗的个体(ID50:284)相比,接受两剂莫德纳疫苗的接种个体中,PSV SARS-CoV-2 ID50滴度中位数增加了一倍多(ID50:597)。
罗氏S抗体检测和Diazyme NAbs检测能够可靠地检测SARS-CoV-2接种个体和SARS-CoV-2感染个体中的适应性免疫反应。Diazyme NAbs检测与接种个体中的PSV SARS-CoV-2 NAbs具有很强相关性。在区分疫苗接种反应与自然感染时,了解商用血清学检测平台的反应性很重要。