Suppr超能文献

商业血清学检测可预测针对 SARS-CoV-2 的中和活性。

Commercial Serology Assays Predict Neutralization Activity against SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.

Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2021 Jan 30;67(2):404-414. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa262.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether a positive serology result correlates with protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. There are also concerns regarding the low positive predictive value of SARS-CoV-2 serology tests, especially when testing populations with low disease prevalence.

METHODS

A neutralization assay was validated in a set of PCR-confirmed positive specimens and in a negative cohort. In addition, 9530 specimens were screened using the Diazyme SARS-CoV-2 IgG serology assay and all positive results (N = 164 individuals) were reanalyzed using the neutralization assay, the Roche total immunoglobin assay, and the Abbott IgG assay. The relationship between the magnitude of a positive SARS-CoV-2 serology result and neutralizing activity was determined. Neutralizing antibody titers (50% inhibitory dilution, ID50) were also longitudinally monitored in patients confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 by PCR.

RESULTS

The SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay had a positive percentage agreement (PPA) of 96.6% with a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test and a negative percentage agreement (NPA) of 98.0% across 100 negative control individuals. ID50 neutralization titers positively correlated with all 3 clinical serology platforms. Longitudinal monitoring of hospitalized PCR-confirmed patients with COVID-19 demonstrated they made high neutralization titers against SARS-CoV-2. PPA between the Diazyme IgG assay alone and the neutralization assay was 50.6%, while combining the Diazyme IgG assay with either the Roche or Abbott platforms increased the PPA to 79.2 and 78.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These 3 clinical serology assays positively correlate with SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity observed in patients with COVID-19. All patients confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive by PCR develop neutralizing antibodies.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚血清学阳性结果是否与针对 SARS-CoV-2 的保护性免疫相关。此外,人们还担心 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测的阳性预测值较低,尤其是在检测疾病流行率较低的人群时。

方法

我们对一组经 PCR 确证的阳性标本和阴性队列中的中和检测进行了验证。此外,我们使用 Diazyme SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清学检测对 9530 份标本进行了筛查,所有阳性结果(N=164 人)均使用中和检测、罗氏总免疫球蛋白检测和 Abbott IgG 检测进行了重新分析。我们还确定了 SARS-CoV-2 血清学阳性结果的幅度与中和活性之间的关系。PCR 确证的 SARS-CoV-2 患者的中和抗体滴度(50%抑制稀释度,ID50)也进行了纵向监测。

结果

SARS-CoV-2 中和检测与 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 检测的阳性百分比符合率(PPA)为 96.6%,与 100 名阴性对照个体的阴性百分比符合率(NPA)为 98.0%。ID50 中和滴度与所有 3 种临床血清学平台均呈正相关。对住院的经 PCR 确证的 COVID-19 患者进行的纵向监测表明,他们对 SARS-CoV-2 产生了高滴度的中和抗体。单独使用 Diazyme IgG 检测与中和检测的 PPA 为 50.6%,而将 Diazyme IgG 检测与罗氏或 Abbott 平台相结合时,PPA 分别提高到 79.2%和 78.4%。

结论

这 3 种临床血清学检测与 COVID-19 患者观察到的 SARS-CoV-2 中和活性呈正相关。所有经 PCR 确证 SARS-CoV-2 阳性的患者均产生中和抗体。

相似文献

1
Commercial Serology Assays Predict Neutralization Activity against SARS-CoV-2.
Clin Chem. 2021 Jan 30;67(2):404-414. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa262.
2
Association between SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies and Commercial Serological Assays.
Clin Chem. 2020 Dec 1;66(12):1538-1547. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa211.
4
Multi-Platform Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays for the Detection of COVID-19.
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1324-1336. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa139.
9
Multiplex assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies improves assay sensitivity and correlation with neutralizing antibodies.
Clin Biochem. 2021 Nov;97:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections on COVID-19: A Literature Review of SARS-CoV-2 Testing.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010009.
2
Serodynamics: A primer and synthetic review of methods for epidemiological inference using serological data.
Epidemics. 2024 Dec;49:100806. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100806. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
4
Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology in the vaccination era and post booster vaccination.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Feb;3(1):100130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100130. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
6
Review of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and Antibody Testing in Diagnosis and Community Surveillance.
Clin Lab Med. 2022 Dec;42(4):687-704. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.09.018.
9
Longitudinal survey of humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in children.
Microbiol Res. 2022 Nov;264:127145. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127145. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-Platform Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays for the Detection of COVID-19.
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1324-1336. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa139.
4
Economic Consequences of the COVID-19 Outbreak: the Need for Epidemic Preparedness.
Front Public Health. 2020 May 29;8:241. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00241. eCollection 2020.
5
Performance of six SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in comparison with microneutralisation.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104512. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104512. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model.
Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):956-963. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7520. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies.
Science. 2020 Aug 7;369(6504):731-736. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7424. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Clinical evaluation of serological IgG antibody response on the Abbott Architect for established SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1256.e9-1256.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
Waiting for Certainty on Covid-19 Antibody Tests - At What Cost?
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):e37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2017739. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验