Suppr超能文献

在接受索磷布韦为基础的直接作用抗病毒药物和抗逆转录病毒治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒和丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者中,估算肾小球滤过率的演变。

Evolution of estimated glomerular filtration rate in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients receiving sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals and antiretroviral therapy.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2021 Jun;28(6):887-896. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13502. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

Abstract

The nephrotoxicity of sofosbuvir (SOF) on human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains controversial. We prospectively compared the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in 167 patients receiving SOF-based direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) who also received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TFV)-based (n = 116) and TFV-free ART (n = 51). The eGFR was assessed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, and the eGFR changes between ART regimens were compared by the generalized estimated equation. During DAA treatment, participants on TFV-based ART had a higher eGFR decline than those on TFV-free ART (slope coefficient difference: -0.82 ml/min/1.73 m /month [95% CI: -1.21 to -0.43]; p < 0.001), whereas the eGFR changes did not differ between groups (slope coefficient difference: 0.13 ml/min/1.73 m /month [95% CI: -0.32 to 0.58]; p = 0.42) after discontinuing DAAs. Participants on TFV TDF-based ART had a higher eGFR decline than those on TFV alafenamide fumarate (TAF)-based ART (slope coefficient difference: -0.31 ml/min/1.73 m /month [95% CI: -0.50 to -0.12]; p = 0.01). After discontinuing DAAs, the eGFR changes did not differ between groups (slope coefficient difference: 0.06 ml/min/1.73 m /month [95% CI: -0.98 to 1.10]; p = 0.91). In conclusion, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on TFV-based ART had a slight eGFR decline compared to those on TFV-free ART during SOF-based DAA therapy. A similar trend between TDF-based and TAF-based ART was also observed. Because the differences of eGFR changes are limited, the physicians should not discourage the use of SOF-based DAAs in HIV-positive patients on TFV-based ART.

摘要

索磷布韦(SOF)对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的人类免疫缺陷病毒和丙型肝炎病毒(HIV/HCV)合并感染患者的肾毒性仍存在争议。我们前瞻性比较了 167 例接受 SOF 为基础的直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗且同时接受替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)为基础(n=116)和无替诺福韦(TFV)ART(n=51)治疗的患者的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)变化。eGFR 通过慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程评估,通过广义估计方程比较不同 ART 方案之间的 eGFR 变化。在 DAA 治疗期间,接受 TDF 为基础 ART 的患者的 eGFR 下降幅度高于接受无 TFV ART 的患者(斜率系数差异:-0.82ml/min/1.73m/月[95%CI:-1.21 至-0.43];p<0.001),但在停止 DAA 后,两组之间的 eGFR 变化无差异(斜率系数差异:0.13ml/min/1.73m/月[95%CI:-0.32 至 0.58];p=0.42)。接受 TDF 替诺福韦艾拉酚胺富马酸盐(TAF)为基础 ART 的患者的 eGFR 下降幅度高于接受 TAF 为基础 ART 的患者(斜率系数差异:-0.31ml/min/1.73m/月[95%CI:-0.50 至-0.12];p=0.01)。停止 DAA 后,两组之间的 eGFR 变化无差异(斜率系数差异:0.06ml/min/1.73m/月[95%CI:-0.98 至 1.10];p=0.91)。总之,与无 TFV ART 相比,接受 TDF 为基础 ART 的 HIV/HCV 合并感染患者在接受 SOF 为基础 DAA 治疗期间,eGFR 略有下降。TDF 为基础和 TAF 为基础 ART 之间也观察到类似的趋势。由于 eGFR 变化的差异有限,医生不应劝阻在接受 TDF 为基础 ART 的 HIV 阳性患者中使用 SOF 为基础的 DAA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验