Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Electrophysiology, Medical Clinic II, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;32(6):1553-1560. doi: 10.1111/jce.15009. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging clinical outcome. The novel fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4) incorporates a 40% shorter distal tip. This design change may translate into an increased rate of PVI real-time signal recording, facilitating an individualized ablation strategy using the time to effect (TTE).
Three hundred consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were prospectively enrolled. The first 150 consecutive patients underwent CB2 based PVI (CB2 group) and the last 150 consecutive patients were treated with the CB4 (CB4 group). A total of 594/594 (100%, CB4) and 589/594 (99.2%, CB2) pulmonary veins (PVs) were successfully isolated utilizing the CB4 and CB2, respectively (p = .283). The real-time PVI visualization rate was 47% (CB4) and 39% (CB2; p = .005) and the mean freeze cycle duration 200 ± 90 s (CB4) and 228 ± 110 s (CB2; p < .001), respectively. The total procedure time did not differ between the groups (CB4: 64 ± 32 min) and (CB2: 62 ± 29 min, p = .370). No differences in periprocedural complications were detected.
A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings are seen using the CB4 as compared to CB2, which may facilitate an individualized ablation strategy using the TTE.
第二代冷冻球囊(CB2)可提供有效的、持久的肺静脉隔离(PVI),并取得了令人鼓舞的临床结果。新型第四代冷冻球囊(CB4)的远端尖端缩短了 40%。这种设计上的改变可能会提高实时 PVI 信号记录的成功率,有助于使用起效时间(TTE)制定个体化消融策略。
前瞻性纳入了 300 例阵发性或持续性心房颤动患者。前 150 例连续患者接受 CB2 为基础的 PVI(CB2 组),后 150 例连续患者接受 CB4 治疗(CB4 组)。使用 CB4 和 CB2 分别成功隔离了 594/594(100%,CB4)和 589/594(99.2%,CB2)条肺静脉(PV)(p=0.283)。实时 PVI 可视化率为 47%(CB4)和 39%(CB2;p=0.005),平均冷冻周期持续时间为 200±90s(CB4)和 228±110s(CB2;p<0.001)。两组之间的总手术时间没有差异(CB4:64±32min)和(CB2:62±29min,p=0.370)。未发现围手术期并发症的差异。
与 CB2 相比,CB4 实现实时电 PV 记录的比例更高,这可能有助于使用 TTE 制定个体化消融策略。