Validated quantitative needs assessment differences in the management of children with central nervous system cancer between Brazil, an upper middle-income country, and the United States of America, a high income country.

BACKGROUND

Pediatric cancer cure rates differ among high-income countries (HIC) and upper middle-income countries (UMIC). We have compared individual capacities of two major referral pediatric centers from a HIC and an UMIC caring for children with central nervous system (CNS) cancer.

METHODS

A quantitative needs assessment questionnaire and key informant interviews, distributed in March of 2017, were used to evaluate the treatment of children with CNS cancer at Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC) children's cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil and Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) in Columbus, Ohio, United States of America (USA).

RESULTS

Both hospitals had 24-hour pediatric oncology, nursing and intensivist coverage. Supportive care available at both institutions included social workers, psychologists, child life specialists, and physical/occupational/speech therapists. Differences included two part-time neuroradiologists and one pathologist specializing in neuropathology at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, whereas eight full-time neuroradiologists and two neuropathologists at NCH/OSU. There were four pediatric neurosurgeons on staff at each hospital; however, there were only 2 operative days per week at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP, compared with 7 days at NCH/OSU. Additionally, time to initiation of radiation therapy at IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP extended 2-4 weeks compared with less than 1 week at NCH/OSU.

CONCLUSIONS

Center-specific differences in resources exist in highly specialized hospitals caring for children with CNS cancer in HIC and UMIC. This quantitative needs assessment may facilitate the development of targeted strategies for effective interventions to improve on the management of children with CNS cancers.