Trugman Einat, Harel Eran
Beer Yaakov -Ness Ziona Mental Health Center.
Harefuah. 2021 Feb;160(2):87-93.
One of the most serious problems in closed psychiatric wards is the issue of violence. Many studies have tried to characterize the violent patients hospitalized in a closed ward. Some research has shown that the strongest predictor of violence is past violence. The closed wards in the country consist of civil patients and patients hospitalized according to a court order following a history of violence, side by side. In this article, we characterized cases of violence that took place in closed wards in 2015, and in addition we examined the effect of hospitalization status on patient aggression and the level of violence in the wards.
The study was performed retrospectively using data from hospital medical and nursing records and reports of unusual events from a risk management database. The subjects included in the study are men and women between the ages of 18-65 years who were admitted to a closed ward in 2015 with a reported violent incident for which they were responsible. The data were examined for the specific event and the percentage of those admitted due to a court order out of all the participants in the violent events was noted. Furthermore, the authors examined the number of violent events with respect to the percentage of those hospitalized by court order in the department at that time. In addition, we examined each violent case and characterized it by pre-determined variables.
As to the legal status, it was clearly found that those hospitalized with a court order were more involved in assault cases. However, it was not found that a higher percentage of those hospitalized by a court order raised the level of violence in the department. In terms of their characterization, the cases of assault were more frequently performed by men, by young people and by bachelors. The clinical diagnoses that characterized the attackers were prolonged disorders of the psychotic spectrum. Most of the events involved physical assault of other patients and staff. The event usually took place in the early days of the hospitalization, most often in the ward lobby and during morning hours.
According to the research hypothesis, patients under a court order are found to be responsible for more cases of violence in active wards. At the same time, the high attendance of those hospitalized by a court order does not increase the amount of violence in the department. These results support the idea of separating outpatients in court orders from other patients, in order to reduce violence in active psychiatric wards, improve inpatient conditions, and adjust dedicated care for populations of different legal status.
封闭精神科病房最严重的问题之一是暴力问题。许多研究试图对封闭病房中住院的暴力患者进行特征描述。一些研究表明,暴力行为最强的预测因素是既往暴力史。该国的封闭病房中既有民事患者,也有因暴力史而根据法院命令住院的患者,二者共处一室。在本文中,我们对2015年封闭病房中发生的暴力事件进行了特征描述,此外,我们还研究了住院状态对患者攻击行为以及病房暴力程度的影响。
本研究采用回顾性研究方法,数据来源于医院医疗和护理记录以及风险管理数据库中的异常事件报告。纳入研究的对象为年龄在18至65岁之间的男性和女性,他们于2015年入住封闭病房,且有一起据报由其负责的暴力事件。对具体事件的数据进行检查,并记录在所有暴力事件参与者中因法院命令而入院者的百分比。此外,作者还研究了暴力事件数量与当时该科室因法院命令住院者的百分比之间的关系。此外,我们检查了每一起暴力事件,并根据预先确定的变量对其进行特征描述。
就法律地位而言,很明显,因法院命令住院的患者更多地参与攻击案件。然而,并未发现因法院命令住院者的较高比例会提高科室的暴力程度。就其特征而言,攻击案件更多由男性、年轻人和单身者实施。攻击者的临床诊断特征为精神病性谱系的持续性障碍。大多数事件涉及对其他患者和工作人员的身体攻击。事件通常发生在住院初期,最常发生在病房大厅和上午时段。
根据研究假设,发现因法院命令住院的患者应对活跃病房中更多的暴力事件负责。同时,因法院命令住院者的高比例并未增加科室的暴力数量。这些结果支持将法院命令下的门诊患者与其他患者分开的想法,以减少活跃精神科病房中的暴力行为,改善住院条件,并针对不同法律地位的人群调整专门护理。