Negaunee Integrative Research Center, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248169. eCollection 2021.
Inequality is present to varying degrees in all human societies, pre-modern and contemporary. For archaeological contexts, variation in house size reflects differences in labor investments and serves as a robust means to assess wealth across populations small and large. The Gini coefficient, which measures the degree of concentration in the distribution of units within a population, has been employed as a standardized metric to evaluate the extent of inequality. Here, we employ Gini coefficients to assess wealth inequality at four nested socio-spatial scales-the micro-region, the polity, the district, and the neighborhood-at two medium size, peripheral Classic Maya polities located in southern Belize. We then compare our findings to Gini coefficients for other Classic Maya polities in the Maya heartland and to contemporaneous polities across Mesoamerica. We see the patterning of wealth inequality across the polities as a consequence of variable access to networks of exchange. Different forms of governance played a role in the degree of wealth inequality in Mesoamerica. More autocratic Classic Maya polities, where principals exercised degrees of control over exclusionary exchange networks, maintained high degrees of wealth inequality compared to most other Mesoamerican states, which generally are characterized by more collective forms of governance. We examine how household wealth inequality was reproduced at peripheral Classic Maya polities, and illustrate that economic inequity trickled down to local socio-spatial units in this prehispanic context.
不平等现象存在于所有人类社会,无论是前现代社会还是当代社会。对于考古学背景,房屋大小的差异反映了劳动力投资的差异,是评估大小人群财富的有力手段。基尼系数用于衡量人口中单位分布的集中程度,是评估不平等程度的标准化指标。在这里,我们使用基尼系数评估了位于伯利兹南部的两个中等规模的外围古典玛雅政治体在四个嵌套的社会空间尺度(微区、政体、区和社区)上的财富不平等程度。然后,我们将我们的发现与玛雅中心地带其他古典玛雅政体的基尼系数以及中美洲同期的政体进行了比较。我们看到,不同政治体之间财富不平等的模式是由于可获得的交换网络的差异造成的。不同形式的治理在中美洲的财富不平等程度中发挥了作用。在古典玛雅政体中,统治者对排他性交换网络行使一定程度的控制,这些政体的财富不平等程度较高,而大多数其他中美洲国家的财富不平等程度则较低,这些国家的治理形式通常更加集体化。我们研究了财富不平等是如何在古典玛雅边缘政治体中复制的,并说明在这种前西班牙背景下,经济不平等现象已经渗透到当地的社会空间单位。