Stroke Program, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.
Stroke Program, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jun;30(6):105727. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105727. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
We explored how the new, tissue-based stroke definition impacted incidence estimates, including an ethnic comparison, in a population-based study.
Stroke patients, May, 2014-May, 2016 in Nueces County, Texas were ascertained and validated using source documentation. Overall, ethnic-specific and age-specific Poisson regression models were used to compare first-ever ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) incidence between old and new stroke definitions, adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score.
Among 1308 subjects, 1245 (95%) were defined as stroke by the old definition and 63 additional cases (5%) according to the new. There were 12 cases of parenchymal hematoma (PH1 or PH2) that were reclassified from ischemic stroke to ICH. Overall, incidence of ischemic stroke was slightly higher under the new compared to the old definition (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99-1.16); similarly higher in both Mexican Americans (RR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.12) and Non Hispanic whites (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.22), p(ethnic difference)=0.36. Overall, incidence of ICH was higher under the new definition compared to old definition (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.05-1.29), similarly higher among both Mexican Americans (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23) and Non Hispanic whites (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39), p(ethnic difference)=0.25.
Modest increases in ischemic stroke and ICH incidence occurred using the new compared with old stroke definition. There were no differences between Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites. These estimates provide stroke burden estimates for public health planning.
我们通过一项基于人群的研究,探讨了新的基于组织的卒中定义如何影响发病估计,包括种族比较。
2014 年 5 月至 2016 年 5 月,在德克萨斯州纽西斯县确定并验证了卒中患者,并使用原始资料进行验证。总体而言,使用年龄特异性和种族特异性泊松回归模型比较新旧卒中定义下首次缺血性卒中和颅内出血(ICH)的发病率,调整年龄、种族、性别和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分。
在 1308 名受试者中,根据旧定义,有 1245 名(95%)被定义为卒中,根据新定义,有 63 例(5%)额外病例。有 12 例实质血肿(PH1 或 PH2)从缺血性卒中重新分类为 ICH。总体而言,新定义下缺血性卒中的发病率略高于旧定义(RR 1.07;95%CI 0.99-1.16);墨西哥裔美国人(RR 1.06;95%CI 1.00-1.12)和非西班牙裔白人(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.97-1.22)中均较高,p(种族差异)=0.36。总体而言,新定义下 ICH 的发病率高于旧定义(RR 1.16;95%CI 1.05-1.29),墨西哥裔美国人(RR 1.14;95%CI 1.06-1.23)和非西班牙裔白人(RR 1.20,95%CI 1.03-1.39)中同样较高,p(种族差异)=0.25。
与旧卒中定义相比,新定义下缺血性卒中和 ICH 的发病率略有增加。墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人之间没有差异。这些估计为公共卫生规划提供了卒中负担的估计。