Neuman Nicklas, Eli Karin, Nowicka Paulina
Department of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10533-1.
Childhood obesity prevention initiatives emphasize healthy eating within the family. However, family-focused initiatives may not benefit children whose families lack economic and/or social resources for home cooking and shared meals. The aim of this paper is to examine how adults talk about and make sense of childhood memories of food and eating, with particular attention to understandings of family life and socioeconomic conditions.
Semi-structured interviews with 49 adults in 16 families (22 parents and 27 grandparents of young children) were conducted in Oregon, United States. Most participants had experienced socioeconomically disadvantaged childhoods. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, with a focus on the participants' memories of food provision, preparation, and consumption in their childhood homes.
Two main themes were developed: (1) "Food and cohesion", with the subthemes "Care and nurturance" and "Virtue transmission through shared meals", and (2) "Food and adversity", with the subthemes "Lack and neglect" and "Restriction and dominance". The first theme captures idealized notions of food in the family, with participants recounting memories of care, nurturance, and culinary pleasure. The second theme captures how participants' recollections of neglectful or rigidly restrictive feeding, as well as food discipline tipping over into dominance, upend such idealized images. Notably, the participants alternately identified poverty as a source of lack and as an instigator of creative and caring, if not always nutritionally-ideal, feeding. Thus, they remembered food they deemed unhealthy as a symbol of both neglect and care, depending on the context in which it was provided.
Childhood memories of food and eating may express both family cohesion and family adversity, and are deeply affected by experiences of socioeconomic disadvantage. The connection between memories of food the participants deemed unhealthy and memories of care suggests that, in the context of socioeconomic disadvantage, unhealthy feeding and eating may become a form of caregiving, with nutrition considered only one aspect of well-being. This has implications for public health initiatives directed at lower-income families.
儿童肥胖预防倡议强调家庭中的健康饮食。然而,以家庭为重点的倡议可能无法使那些家庭缺乏在家做饭和共享膳食所需经济和/或社会资源的儿童受益。本文旨在研究成年人如何谈论童年时期的食物和饮食记忆并理解这些记忆,尤其关注对家庭生活和社会经济状况的理解。
在美国俄勒冈州对16个家庭中的49名成年人(22名幼儿的父母和27名幼儿的祖父母)进行了半结构化访谈。大多数参与者童年时经历过社会经济劣势。访谈采用主题分析法进行分析,重点关注参与者对童年家中食物供应、准备和消费的记忆。
形成了两个主要主题:(1)“食物与凝聚力”,其亚主题为“关爱与养育”和“通过共享膳食传承美德”;(2)“食物与逆境”,其亚主题为“匮乏与忽视”和“限制与支配”。第一个主题体现了家庭中对食物的理想化观念,参与者讲述了关爱、养育和烹饪乐趣的记忆。第二个主题体现了参与者对忽视或严格限制喂养的回忆,以及食物管教演变为支配,如何颠覆了这种理想化形象。值得注意的是,参与者交替将贫困视为匮乏的根源,以及创造性和关爱的(即便并非总是营养理想的)喂养方式的促成因素。因此,他们将自己认为不健康的食物既视为忽视的象征,也视为关爱的象征,这取决于提供食物的背景。
童年时期的食物和饮食记忆可能既表达了家庭凝聚力,也表达了家庭逆境,并且深受社会经济劣势经历的影响。参与者认为不健康的食物记忆与关爱记忆之间的联系表明,在社会经济劣势背景下,不健康的喂养和饮食可能成为一种照顾方式,而营养仅被视为幸福的一个方面。这对针对低收入家庭的公共卫生倡议具有启示意义。