D'Agate S, Musuamba F Tshinanu, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Della Pasqua O
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 8;12:624662. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.624662. eCollection 2021.
The effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in newborns in resource-limited settings has been determined by empirical evidence. However, such an approach does not warrant optimal exposure to antibiotic agents, which are known to show different disposition characteristics in this population. Here we evaluate the rationale for a simplified regimen of gentamicin taking into account the effect of body size and organ maturation on pharmacokinetics. The analysis is supported by efficacy data from a series of clinical trials in this population. A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate gentamicin concentration vs. time profiles in a virtual cohort of neonates. Model predictive performance was assessed by supplementary external validation procedures using therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in neonates and young infants with or without sepsis. Subsequently, clinical trial simulations were performed to characterize the exposure to intra-muscular gentamicin after a q.d. regimen. The selection of a simplified regimen was based on peak and trough drug levels during the course of treatment. In contrast to current World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend gentamicin doses between 5 and 7.5 mg/kg, our analysis shows that gentamicin can be used as a fixed dose regimen according to three weight-bands: 10 mg for patients with body weight <2.5 kg, 16 mg for patients with body weight between 2.5 and 4 kg, and 30 mg for those with body weight >4 kg. The choice of the dose of an antibiotic must be supported by a strong scientific rationale, taking into account the differences in drug disposition in the target patient population. Our analysis reveals that a simplified regimen is feasible and could be used in resource-limited settings for the treatment of sepsis in neonates and young infants with sepsis aged 0-59 days.
在资源有限的环境中,抗生素治疗新生儿严重细菌感染的有效性已由经验证据确定。然而,这种方法并不能保证最佳的抗生素暴露,因为已知抗生素在该人群中表现出不同的处置特征。在此,我们考虑体重和器官成熟对药代动力学的影响,评估简化庆大霉素治疗方案的基本原理。该分析得到了该人群一系列临床试验疗效数据的支持。使用先前发表的药代动力学模型来模拟虚拟新生儿队列中庆大霉素浓度与时间的关系曲线。通过使用在患有或未患有败血症的新生儿和幼儿中收集的治疗药物监测数据的补充外部验证程序来评估模型预测性能。随后,进行临床试验模拟以表征每日一次给药方案后肌内注射庆大霉素的暴露情况。简化方案的选择基于治疗过程中的药物峰浓度和谷浓度。与世界卫生组织目前建议庆大霉素剂量为5至7.5mg/kg的指南不同,我们的分析表明,庆大霉素可根据三个体重范围用作固定剂量方案:体重<2.5kg的患者为10mg,体重在2.5至4kg之间的患者为16mg,体重>4kg的患者为30mg。抗生素剂量的选择必须有充分的科学依据,同时要考虑目标患者群体中药物处置的差异。我们的分析表明,简化方案是可行的,可用于资源有限的环境中治疗0至59天患有败血症的新生儿和幼儿。