University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Respiratory Research Center, CEPIR, La Plata, Argentina.
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4065-4088. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02962-2. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
Although some factors associated with asthma symptom deterioration and risk of exacerbation have been identified, these are not yet fully characterised. We conducted a clinical modelling and simulation study to understand baseline factors affecting symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma during follow-up on regularly dosed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy, or ICS/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy.
Individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (undertaken between 2001 and 2019) were used to model the time course of symptoms (n = 7593), patterns of reliever medication use (n = 3768) and time-to-first exacerbation (n = 6763), considering patient-specific and extrinsic factors, including treatment. Model validation used standard graphical and statistical criteria. Change in symptom control scores (Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 [ACQ-5]), reduction in reliever use and annualised exacerbation rate were then simulated in patient cohorts with different baseline characteristics and treatment settings.
Being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and body mass index affected symptom control scores, reliever use and exacerbation risk (p < 0.01). In addition, low forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent predicted, female sex, season and previous exacerbations were found to contribute to a further increase in exacerbation risk (p < 0.01), whereas long asthma history was associated with more frequent reliever use (p < 0.01). These effects were independent from the underlying maintenance therapy. In different scenarios, fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol was associated with greater reductions in reliever use and exacerbation rates compared with FF or fluticasone propionate (FP) alone or budesonide/formoterol, independently from other factors (p < 0.01).
This study provided further insight into the effects of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response and highlighted significant differences in the performance of ICS/LABA combination therapy on symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk. These factors should be incorporated into clinical practice as the basis for tailored management of patients with moderate-severe asthma.
虽然已经确定了一些与哮喘症状恶化和加重风险相关的因素,但这些因素尚未得到充分描述。我们进行了一项临床建模和模拟研究,以了解在接受常规剂量吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)单药治疗或 ICS/长效β激动剂(LABA)联合治疗的中重度哮喘患者随访期间,影响症状控制、缓解药物使用和加重风险的基线因素。
使用来自随机临床试验(2001 年至 2019 年进行)的个体患者数据来模拟症状的时间过程(n=7593)、缓解药物使用模式(n=3768)和首次加重时间(n=6763),考虑到患者特异性和外在因素,包括治疗。使用标准图形和统计标准验证模型。然后,根据不同的基线特征和治疗方案,在患者队列中模拟症状控制评分(哮喘控制问卷 5 [ACQ-5])的变化、缓解药物使用减少和年加重率。
吸烟、较高的基线 ACQ-5 和体重指数会影响症状控制评分、缓解药物使用和加重风险(p<0.01)。此外,较低的用力呼气量 1 秒百分比预测值、女性、季节和既往加重与加重风险进一步增加有关(p<0.01),而哮喘病史较长与更频繁使用缓解药物有关(p<0.01)。这些影响独立于基础维持治疗。在不同情况下,糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗与单独使用糠酸氟替卡松或丙酸氟替卡松或布地奈德/福莫特罗相比,与减少缓解药物使用和加重率的相关性更大,这与其他因素无关(p<0.01)。
本研究进一步深入了解了个体基线特征对治疗反应的影响,并强调了 ICS/LABA 联合治疗在症状控制、缓解药物使用和加重风险方面的显著差异。这些因素应纳入临床实践,作为中重度哮喘患者个体化管理的基础。