Suppr超能文献

肥胖与压力性尿失禁:相对体重指数的意义

Obesity and stress urinary incontinence: significance of indices of relative weight.

作者信息

Kölbl H, Riss P

机构信息

Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Urol Int. 1988;43(1):7-10. doi: 10.1159/000281293.

Abstract

We analyzed the significance of weight and various indices of relative weight in the assessment of genuine stress incontinence (GSI) in 193 female patients. Body mass index [BMI = weight/(height2)] and the other indices of relative weight [weight/height - weight/(height3)] were not markedly different between patients with GSI and a control group of 43 females without demonstrable incontinence. A markedly increased BMI was found to be correlated with a positive clinical stress test. In addition BMI was significantly higher in patients with a higher maximum urethral pressure. We conclude that although obese women tend to have higher maximum urethral pressures, this advantage disappears in regard to the maximum urethral closure pressure, resulting in a higher prevalence of positive clinical stress test.

摘要

我们分析了体重及各种相对体重指数在评估193例女性真性压力性尿失禁(GSI)中的意义。体重指数[BMI =体重/(身高²)]及其他相对体重指数[体重/身高 - 体重/(身高³)]在GSI患者与43例无明显尿失禁的女性对照组之间无明显差异。发现BMI显著升高与临床压力试验阳性相关。此外,最大尿道压较高的患者BMI也显著更高。我们得出结论,尽管肥胖女性往往具有较高的最大尿道压,但在最大尿道闭合压方面这种优势消失,导致临床压力试验阳性的患病率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验