Suppr超能文献

肥胖与压力性尿失禁:相对体重指数的意义

Obesity and stress urinary incontinence: significance of indices of relative weight.

作者信息

Kölbl H, Riss P

机构信息

Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Urol Int. 1988;43(1):7-10. doi: 10.1159/000281293.

Abstract

We analyzed the significance of weight and various indices of relative weight in the assessment of genuine stress incontinence (GSI) in 193 female patients. Body mass index [BMI = weight/(height2)] and the other indices of relative weight [weight/height - weight/(height3)] were not markedly different between patients with GSI and a control group of 43 females without demonstrable incontinence. A markedly increased BMI was found to be correlated with a positive clinical stress test. In addition BMI was significantly higher in patients with a higher maximum urethral pressure. We conclude that although obese women tend to have higher maximum urethral pressures, this advantage disappears in regard to the maximum urethral closure pressure, resulting in a higher prevalence of positive clinical stress test.

摘要

我们分析了体重及各种相对体重指数在评估193例女性真性压力性尿失禁(GSI)中的意义。体重指数[BMI =体重/(身高²)]及其他相对体重指数[体重/身高 - 体重/(身高³)]在GSI患者与43例无明显尿失禁的女性对照组之间无明显差异。发现BMI显著升高与临床压力试验阳性相关。此外,最大尿道压较高的患者BMI也显著更高。我们得出结论,尽管肥胖女性往往具有较高的最大尿道压,但在最大尿道闭合压方面这种优势消失,导致临床压力试验阳性的患病率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验