• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨在团队学习(TBL)中使用非常简短回答问题(VSAQs)的可行性。

Exploring the feasibility of using very short answer questions (VSAQs) in team-based learning (TBL).

机构信息

Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Teach. 2021 Aug;18(4):404-408. doi: 10.1111/tct.13347. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/tct.13347
PMID:33763986
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Team-based learning (TBL) currently relies on single best answer questions (SBAQs) to provide immediate feedback. Very short answer questions (VSAQs) are a reliable and discriminatory alternative that encourage learners to use more authentic clinical reasoning strategies compared to SBAQs. However, the challenge of marking VSAQs has limited their integration into TBL; we therefore explored the feasibility of VSAQs within a TBL session.

METHODS

An online platform was developed to allow immediate marking of VSAQs during the TBL sessions. As part of the readiness assurance process, students completed VSAQs and SBAQs, which were marked in real time.

RESULTS

Instructors were able to mark all VSAQs during the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), which facilitated the provision of immediate feedback during the team readiness assurance test (tRAT). The mean time to mark five VSAQs was 422 seconds (SD 73 seconds). For VSAQs, the number of attempts to reach the correct answer ranged from 1 to 38, compared to 1 to 4 for SBAQs. In total, 71.6% of students agreed that using VSAQs in TBL helped to emphasise group discussions.

DISCUSSION

The wide range of attempts at, and students' perspectives of VSAQs are suggestive of their positive impact on student discussion during TBL. We demonstrate how new technology allows VSAQs to be feasibly integrated into TBL with the potential to enrich group discussions.

摘要

背景

团队学习(TBL)目前依赖单项最佳答案问题(SBAQs)来提供即时反馈。简短答案问题(VSAQs)是一种可靠且有区别的替代方法,它鼓励学习者使用更真实的临床推理策略,而不是 SBAQs。然而,VSAQs 的评分挑战限制了它们在 TBL 中的整合;因此,我们探索了在 TBL 课程中使用 VSAQs 的可行性。

方法

开发了一个在线平台,以便在 TBL 课程中即时标记 VSAQs。作为准备情况保证过程的一部分,学生完成了 VSAQs 和 SBAQs,并实时进行了评分。

结果

在个人准备情况保证测试(iRAT)期间,教师能够标记所有 VSAQs,这有助于在团队准备情况保证测试(tRAT)中提供即时反馈。标记五个 VSAQs 的平均时间为 422 秒(SD 73 秒)。对于 VSAQs,达到正确答案的尝试次数范围从 1 到 38,而 SBAQs 的尝试次数范围从 1 到 4。总的来说,71.6%的学生同意在 TBL 中使用 VSAQs 有助于强调小组讨论。

讨论

VSAQs 的尝试次数范围广泛,以及学生对 VSAQs 的看法表明它们对 TBL 期间学生讨论产生了积极影响。我们展示了新技术如何能够将 VSAQs 切实地整合到 TBL 中,从而丰富小组讨论。

相似文献

1
Exploring the feasibility of using very short answer questions (VSAQs) in team-based learning (TBL).探讨在团队学习(TBL)中使用非常简短回答问题(VSAQs)的可行性。
Clin Teach. 2021 Aug;18(4):404-408. doi: 10.1111/tct.13347. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Very Short Answer Questions in Team-Based Learning: Limited Effect on Peer Elaboration and Memory.基于团队学习中的极短回答问题:对同伴阐述和记忆的影响有限
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Dec 20;33(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01716-5. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
4
Very Short Answer Questions: A Novel Approach To Summative Assessments In Pathology.极简短回答问题:病理学总结性评估的一种新方法。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Nov 4;10:943-948. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S197977. eCollection 2019.
5
Very-short-answer questions: reliability, discrimination and acceptability.简答题:信度、区分度和可接受性。
Med Educ. 2018 Apr;52(4):447-455. doi: 10.1111/medu.13504. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
7
Twelve tips for introducing very short answer questions (VSAQs) into your medical curriculum.将极短回答问题(VSAQs)引入医学课程的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2023 Apr;45(4):360-367. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2093706. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
8
Thinking differently - Students' cognitive processes when answering two different formats of written question.从不同角度思考——学生回答两种不同书面问题形式时的认知过程。
Med Teach. 2021 Nov;43(11):1278-1285. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1935831. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
9
Exploring the dynamics of situational interest in team-based learning in undergraduate medical education.探索团队学习模式下本科生医学教育情境兴趣的动态变化。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05769-5.
10
Effectiveness of Online Team-based Learning for Pharmacists on How to Conduct Clinical Medication Reviews for Old Patients in Japan: A Randomized Controlled Trial.在线团队学习对药师在日本为老年患者进行临床药物审查的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
In Vivo. 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):460-466. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13460.

引用本文的文献

1
Which curriculum components do medical students find most helpful for evaluating AI outputs?医学生认为哪些课程组成部分对评估人工智能输出最有帮助?
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06735-5.
2
Student feedback on team-based learning in a preclinical oral surgery course: A pilot study.临床前口腔外科课程中基于团队学习的学生反馈:一项试点研究。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024 Jun 15;19(4):705-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.06.002. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Very Short Answer Questions in Team-Based Learning: Limited Effect on Peer Elaboration and Memory.
基于团队学习中的极短回答问题:对同伴阐述和记忆的影响有限
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Dec 20;33(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01716-5. eCollection 2023 Feb.