Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Apr;30(2):312-327. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000869.
This paper raises three concerns regarding self-ownership rhetoric to describe autonomy within healthcare in general and reproductive justice in specific. First, private property and the notion of "ownership" embedded in "self-ownership," rely on and replicate historical injustices related to the initial acquisition of property. Second, not all individuals are recognized as selves with equal access to self-ownership. Third, self-ownership only justifies negative liberties. To fully protect healthcare access and reproductive care in specific, we must also be able to make claims on others to respect, protect, and fulfill our positive rights. As much as nondomination remains an urgent demand for reproductive rights, it does not go far enough to ensure reproductive justice.
这篇论文提出了三个关于自我所有权言论的关注点，这些言论用于描述一般医疗保健领域和具体生殖正义领域中的自主性。首先，私有财产和“自我所有权”中所包含的“所有权”概念，依赖于并复制了与最初财产获取相关的历史不公正。其次，并非所有个体都被视为具有平等自我所有权的自我。第三，自我所有权仅证明了消极自由的合理性。为了全面保护医疗保健的可及性和具体生殖护理，我们还必须能够要求他人尊重、保护和履行我们的积极权利。非支配虽然仍然是生殖权利的紧迫需求，但它远远不足以确保生殖正义。
