George Washington University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Oct 1;46(5):761-783. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9155963.
The racial health equity implications of the Trump administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We focus on four key health care policy decisions made by the administration in response to the public health emergency: rejecting a special Marketplace enrollment period, failing to use its full powers to enhance state Medicaid emergency options, refusing to suspend the public charge rule, and failing to target provider relief funds to providers serving the uninsured.
In each case, the administration's policy choices intensified, rather than mitigated, racial health inequality. Its choices had a disproportionate adverse impact on minority populations and patients who are more likely to depend on public programs, be poor, experience pandemic-related job loss, lack insurance, rely on health care safety net providers, and be exposed to public charge sanctions.
Ending structural racism in health care and promoting racial health care equity demands an equity-mindful approach to the pursuit of policies that enhance-rather than undermine-health care accessibility and effectiveness and resources for the poorest communities and the providers that serve them.
特朗普政府对 COVID-19 大流行的反应对种族健康公平的影响。
我们关注政府为应对公共卫生紧急情况而做出的四项关键医疗保健政策决定:拒绝特别的市场参保期,不充分利用其全部权力来增强州医疗补助紧急选择,拒绝暂停公共收费规则,以及未能将提供者救济资金用于为未参保者提供服务的提供者。
在每种情况下,政府的政策选择都加剧了,而不是减轻了种族健康不平等。其选择对少数民族人口和更有可能依赖公共计划的患者产生了不成比例的不利影响,这些患者更可能是贫困人口、遭受与疫情相关的失业、缺乏保险、依赖医疗保健安全网提供者,并且更容易受到公共收费制裁。
要想在医疗保健中结束结构性种族主义并促进种族健康公平,就需要采取公平意识的方法来追求增强而不是破坏医疗保健可及性和有效性以及为最贫困社区及其服务提供者提供资源的政策。