• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伊巴丹大学教学医院首席托尼·阿内尼赫老年医学中心就诊的老年人中,虚弱综合征的流行情况及相关因素。

Prevalence and Correlates of Frailty Syndrome among Older Adults Attending Chief Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre, University College Hospital, Ibadan.

机构信息

Chief Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre, University College Hospital, Oyo State, Ibadan, Nigeria.

University College Hospital and Senior Research Fellow, Neuroscience and Ageing Research Unit, Institute for Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 2021 Mar 22;38(3):255-267.

PMID:33765747
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty has emerged as an important clinical measurement among older adults because of its negative health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study measured the prevalence and factors associated with frailty among older adults aged 60 years and above at a Geriatric Centre in Nigeria.

METHODS

In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 971 older adults were recruited consecutively. Data on sociodemographics characteristics and clinical parameters were obtained using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and physical examination performed. The Frailty syndrome and Frailty Index were assessed using the Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC) and Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) scale respectively. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using SPSS version 21 at a p <0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 71.3 (± 7.1) years with a female to male ratio of 2.4:1. Based on FFC scale, 498 older persons (51.3%) had frailty syndrome while only 148 (15.2%) were frail using the CSHA scale. The measure of agreement (Kappa statistics) was 0.22 (p<0001) indicating weak agreement between the two scales. Logistic regression analysis revealed increasing age (OR=1.948 [1.219-3.113]), multiple morbidities (OR= 1.584, [1.177-2.201]), depression (OR= 5.050, [2.501-9.442,]), imbalance or increased risk of fall (OR 1.623, [1.192-2.211,]), and inability to perform IADL (OR= 0.599 [0.535-0.670,]) to be the most significant determinants of frailty syndrome while obesity (OR=0.660, [0.449-0.971]), unusually appeared a deterrent.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of frailty syndrome was high among the older adults. Targeted and timely interventions on the modifiable factors may delay progression into frailty and the eventual negative health outcomes.

摘要

背景

衰弱已成为老年人重要的临床测量指标,因为它会对健康产生负面影响。

目的

本研究旨在测量尼日利亚一家老年医学中心 60 岁及以上老年人的衰弱患病率及相关因素。

方法

在这项描述性的横断面研究中,连续招募了 971 名老年人。使用访谈者管理的问卷和体格检查获取社会人口统计学特征和临床参数的数据。使用 Fried 衰弱标准(FFC)和加拿大健康与老龄化研究(CSHA)量表分别评估衰弱综合征和衰弱指数。使用 SPSS 版本 21 进行单变量和多变量分析,p<0.05。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 71.3(±7.1)岁,女性与男性的比例为 2.4:1。根据 FFC 量表,498 名老年人(51.3%)患有衰弱综合征,而仅 148 名老年人(15.2%)患有 CSHA 量表的衰弱。(Kappa 统计量)衡量的一致性为 0.22(p<0001),表明这两个量表之间的一致性较弱。逻辑回归分析显示,年龄增长(OR=1.948 [1.219-3.113])、多种合并症(OR=1.584,[1.177-2.201])、抑郁(OR=5.050,[2.501-9.442,])、平衡或增加跌倒风险(OR 1.623,[1.192-2.211,])和无法进行 IADL(OR=0.599 [0.535-0.670,])是衰弱综合征的最重要决定因素,而肥胖(OR=0.660,[0.449-0.971])则相反,似乎是一个抑制因素。

结论

衰弱综合征在老年人中患病率较高。针对可改变因素的有针对性和及时的干预措施可能会延缓衰弱的进展和最终的负面健康结果。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Correlates of Frailty Syndrome among Older Adults Attending Chief Tony Anenih Geriatric Centre, University College Hospital, Ibadan.在伊巴丹大学教学医院首席托尼·阿内尼赫老年医学中心就诊的老年人中,虚弱综合征的流行情况及相关因素。
West Afr J Med. 2021 Mar 22;38(3):255-267.
2
Prevalence and determinants of frailty in older adult patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study.慢性冠状动脉综合征老年患者衰弱的患病率及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02426-0.
3
Frailty and mortality among older patients in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.尼日利亚一家三级医院老年患者的衰弱与死亡率
Ghana Med J. 2019 Sep;53(3):210-216. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v53i3.5.
4
Prevalence of frailty and its association with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and resource utilization in a population of Singaporean older adults.在新加坡老年人群体中,衰弱的流行情况及其与社会人口学和临床特征的关系,以及与资源利用的关系。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1444-1454. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12891. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Assessment of frailty in Saudi community-dwelling older adults: validation of measurements.沙特社区居住老年人的衰弱评估:测量方法的验证
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):197-204. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.197. Epub 2019 May 30.
6
Functional Disability and Social Support in Older Patients attending Chief Tony Anenih Geriatrics Center (CTAGC) University College Hospital, Ibadan Southwestern, Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部伊巴丹大学教学医院首席托尼·阿内尼赫老年病学中心(CTAGC)老年患者的功能障碍和社会支持。
West Afr J Med. 2024 Feb 29;41(2):148-155.
7
Physical Frailty among Urban-Living Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Malaysia.马来西亚城市居住社区老年人的身体虚弱。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;17(18):6549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186549.
8
Frailty and physical function in older HIV-infected adults.老年 HIV 感染者的虚弱和身体功能。
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):522-526. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx013.
9
Concordances and differences between a unidimensional and multidimensional assessment of frailty: a cross-sectional study.衰弱的一维和多维评估之间的一致性和差异:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1369-7.
10
Screening for Frailty and Sarcopenia Among Older Persons in Medical Outpatient Clinics and its Associations With Healthcare Burden.在医疗门诊中筛查老年人虚弱和肌少症及其与医疗负担的关系。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of frailty and association with intrinsic capacity decline among community-dwelling older people in Cameroon: a cross sectional study.喀麦隆社区居住老年人中衰弱的患病率及其与内在能力下降的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 14;25(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06011-7.
2
Frailty: a global health challenge in need of local action.衰弱:需要全球行动的全球性健康挑战。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Aug 9;9(8):e015173. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015173.