Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Okayama Urological Research Group: OURG, 2-2-7-1, Ima-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-0975, Japan.
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00819-2.
The advantages of photodynamic diagnostic technology using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA-PDD) have been established. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the usefulness of ALA-PDD to diagnose upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC) using the Olympus VISERA ELITE video system.
We carried out a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, non-contrast and open label cohort pilot study that involved patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS) to detect UT-UC. 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride was orally administered before URS. The observational results and pathological diagnosis with ALA-PDD and traditional white light methods were compared, and the proportion of positive subjects and specimens were calculated.
A total of 20 patients were enrolled and one patient who had multiple bladder tumors did not undergo URS. Fifteen of 19 patients were pathologically diagnosed with UT-UC and of these 11 (73.3%) were ALA-PDD positive. Fourteen of 19 patients were ALA-PDD positive and of these 11 were pathologically diagnosed with UC. For the 92 biopsy specimens that were malignant or benign, the sensitivity for both traditional white light observation and ALA-PDD was the same at 62.5%, whereas the specificities were 73.1% and 67.3%, respectively. Of the 38 specimens that were randomly biopsied without any abnormality under examination by both white light and ALA-PDD, 11 specimens (28.9%) from 5 patients were diagnosed with high grade UC. In contrast, four specimens from 4 patients, which were negative in traditional white light observation but positive in ALA-PDD, were diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (CIS).
Our results suggest that ALA-PDD using VISERA ELITE is not sufficiently applicable for UT-UC. Nevertheless, it might be better particularly for CIS than white light and superior results would be obtained using VISERA ELITE II video system.
The present clinical study was approved by the Okayama University Institutional Review Board prior to study initiation (Application no.: RIN 1803-002) and was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), Japan (Accession no.: UMIN000031205).
5-氨基酮戊酸光动力诊断技术(ALA-PDD)的优势已得到证实。本前瞻性队列研究旨在评估使用奥林巴斯 VISERA ELITE 视频系统进行 ALA-PDD 在上尿路尿路上皮癌(UT-UC)诊断中的应用价值。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、干预性、非随机、非对比和开放标签的队列研究,涉及接受输尿管镜检查(URS)以检测 UT-UC 的患者。在 URS 前口服盐酸 5-氨基酮戊酸。比较 ALA-PDD 和传统白光方法的观察结果和病理诊断,并计算阳性患者和标本的比例。
共纳入 20 例患者,其中 1 例患者因膀胱多发肿瘤未行 URS。19 例患者中有 15 例经病理诊断为 UT-UC,其中 11 例(73.3%)为 ALA-PDD 阳性。19 例患者中有 14 例为 ALA-PDD 阳性,其中 11 例经病理诊断为 UC。在 92 例恶性或良性活检标本中,传统白光观察和 ALA-PDD 的敏感性均为 62.5%,而特异性分别为 73.1%和 67.3%。在白光和 ALA-PDD 检查均未见异常的 38 例随机活检标本中,5 例患者的 11 例(28.9%)标本诊断为高级别 UC。相比之下,4 例患者的 4 例标本在传统白光观察中为阴性,但在 ALA-PDD 中为阳性,被诊断为原位癌(CIS)。
我们的结果表明,VISERA ELITE 上的 ALA-PDD 对 UT-UC 的应用尚不足够。然而,它可能比白光更适合 CIS,并且使用 VISERA ELITE II 视频系统可以获得更好的结果。
本临床研究在研究启动前获得了冈山大学机构审查委员会的批准(申请号:RIN 1803-002),并在日本 UMIN 临床试验注册中心(UMIN-CTR)注册(注册号:UMIN000031205)。