• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗合并微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China; Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100730, China.

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2021 Sep;44(9):1143-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.023
PMID:33766529
Abstract

The efficacy of anatomical resection (AR) and non-anatomical resection (NR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) remains unknown. This study compared the safety and outcomes of these surgical procedures. A systematic literature search was conducted. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS). Overall hazard ratio (HR) was calculated from Kaplan-Meier plots and outcomes using random-effects models. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the AR and NR groups (risk ratio [RR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.17, p = 0.496). OS was higher with AR at 1 year (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45-0.98, p = 0.037), 3 years (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50-0.82, p = 0.000), and 5 years (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89, p = 0.001). AR was associated with a higher OS rate (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82, p = 0.001). AR was associated with improved DFS at 1 year (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82, p = 0.000), 3 years (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.86, p = 0.000), and 5 years (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.94, p = 0.002). Compared with NR, AR had significant advantages on overall HR of DFS (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.91, p = 0.012). In conclusion, AR was associated with higher rates of OS and DFS in HCC patients with MVI. Thus, for well-presented liver function HCC patients which are predicted to have positive MVI, AR is recommended.

摘要

解剖性切除术(AR)和非解剖性切除术(NR)治疗伴有微血管侵犯(MVI)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效尚不清楚。本研究比较了这两种手术方法的安全性和结果。进行了系统的文献检索。主要结局是总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)。使用随机效应模型从 Kaplan-Meier 图和结果计算总体危险比(HR)。AR 组和 NR 组的术后并发症无显著差异(风险比 [RR]:0.92,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.72-1.17,p=0.496)。AR 组的 1 年(RR:0.66,95%CI:0.45-0.98,p=0.037)、3 年(RR:0.64,95%CI:0.50-0.82,p=0.000)和 5 年(RR:0.76,95%CI:0.65-0.89,p=0.001)OS 更高。AR 与更高的 OS 率相关(HR:0.62,95%CI:0.47-0.82,p=0.001)。AR 与 1 年(RR:0.65,95%CI:0.52-0.82,p=0.000)、3 年(RR:0.75,95%CI:0.66-0.86,p=0.000)和 5 年(95%CI:0.75-0.94,p=0.002)DFS 率的提高相关。与 NR 相比,AR 在 DFS 的总体 HR 方面具有显著优势(HR:0.64,95%CI:0.45-0.91,p=0.012)。总之,AR 与 MVI 阳性 HCC 患者的 OS 和 DFS 率较高相关。因此,对于具有良好肝功能且预计 MVI 阳性的 HCC 患者,推荐使用 AR。

相似文献

1
Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗合并微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Sep;44(9):1143-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Oncological outcomes of anatomic versus non-anatomic resections for small hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗小肝细胞癌的肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 19;20(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02770-4.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
6
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
8
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines.右雷佐生预防或减少接受蒽环类抗生素治疗的癌症成人和儿童的心脏毒性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 27;9(9):CD014638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014638.pub2.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
10
Therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.等待肝移植的肝细胞癌患者的治疗方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):381-400. doi: 10.1002/hep.29485. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Competing risk analysis of surgical resection radiofrequency ablation in early-stage small hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER-based study.早期小肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融的竞争风险分析:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):3565-3576. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2024-2550. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Model Construction for Predicting Preoperative Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Serology.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像联合血清学预测肝细胞癌术前微血管侵犯的模型构建
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 1;31:e947809. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947809.
3
Assessment prior to liver tumor resection: what a radiologist needs to know.
肝肿瘤切除术前评估:放射科医生需要了解的内容。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05078-5.
4
Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion (2024 edition).肝细胞癌微血管侵犯诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2024年版)
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Apr 1;14(2):246-266. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-359. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
5
Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: a propensity score-matching study.微创与开放肝切除术治疗伴微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3492-3503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11717-1. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
6
Dual-energy computed tomography iodine quantification combined with laboratory data for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-centre study.双能 CT 碘定量与实验室数据联合预测肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的价值:一项多中心研究。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Aug 1;97(1160):1467-1475. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae116.
7
Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: findings from five longitudinal studies.老年人的数字排斥和认知障碍:五项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 7;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05026-w.
8
Minimizing blood loss and transfusion rate in laparoscopic liver surgery: a review.腹腔镜肝手术中减少失血和输血率:综述
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):213-223. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.124088. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.《2022年韩国肝脏癌协会-韩国国立癌症中心肝细胞癌管理实践指南》
J Liver Cancer. 2023 Mar;23(1):1-120. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
10
The Comparison of Surgical Margins and Type of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion.《伴有微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的手术切缘与肝切除类型比较》
Oncologist. 2023 Nov 2;28(11):e1043-e1051. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad124.