Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jun;232(6):982-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of surgical treatments for lymphedema. This study reports the outcomes of vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) for the treatment of patients with lymphedema compared with maximal conservative treatment alone.
Consecutive patients undergoing VLNT to treat primary and secondary lymphedema affecting the upper or lower extremities were included. All patients were optimized preoperatively with conservative therapy. Demographic and treatment information was collected, and outcomes data were electronically captured prospectively; descriptive statistics were performed.
There were 134 patients included that had achieved maximal reductions by conservative therapy preoperatively. This series included jejunal mesenteric (n = 25), groin (n = 43), lateral thoracic (n = 31), omental or right gastroepiploic (n = 21), and submental (n = 14) VLN flaps. At 24 months postoperatively, there were significant reductions in limb volume change (mean [SD] 45.7% [8.7%]; p = 0.002) LDex score (mean [SD] 59.8% [8.7%]; p < 0.001), Lymphedema Life Impact Scale score (mean [SD] 61.6% [5.9]; p < 0.001), and cellulitis episodes (97.9%; p < 0.001). At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, limb volume change was significantly greater for the upper than the lower extremity, otherwise outcomes were similar. There were no flap losses and overall outcomes were similar between the different VLN flap types.
Treatment of lymphedema using VLNT resulted in progressive, significant reductions in limb volume, bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements of extracellular fluid, and episodes of cellulitis, with improved patient-reported outcomes and limb function measures compared with maximal conservative therapy alone. The complication rate was low and there were no significant outcomes differences between the VLNT types.
越来越多的证据支持手术治疗淋巴水肿的疗效。本研究报告了与单独最大保守治疗相比,血管化淋巴结移植(VLNT)治疗淋巴水肿患者的结果。
纳入连续接受 VLNT 治疗原发性和继发性淋巴水肿影响上下肢的患者。所有患者均在术前接受最大保守治疗优化。收集人口统计学和治疗信息,并前瞻性地电子捕获结果数据;进行描述性统计。
共有 134 例患者在术前通过保守治疗达到最大减少。该系列包括空肠肠系膜(n=25)、腹股沟(n=43)、外侧胸壁(n=31)、网膜或右胃网膜(n=21)和颏下(n=14)VLN 皮瓣。术后 24 个月,肢体体积变化(平均[标准差]45.7%[8.7%];p=0.002)、LDex 评分(平均[标准差]59.8%[8.7%];p<0.001)、淋巴水肿生活影响量表评分(平均[标准差]61.6%[5.9%];p<0.001)和蜂窝织炎发作(97.9%;p<0.001)均有显著降低。术后 3 个月和 6 个月,上肢肢体体积变化明显大于下肢,否则结果相似。无皮瓣丢失,不同 VLN 皮瓣类型的总体结果相似。
使用 VLNT 治疗淋巴水肿可导致肢体体积、细胞外液生物阻抗光谱测量和蜂窝织炎发作逐渐显著减少,与单独最大保守治疗相比,患者报告的结果和肢体功能测量指标得到改善。并发症发生率低,VLNT 类型之间无显著结果差异。