From the Department of Ultrasound (J.Z., X.H., J.X., H.W., F.D.), First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Second Clinical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasound Engineering Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station (X.H.), Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;42(6):1052-1060. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7061. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
A noninvasive, safe, and economic imaging technique is required to identify epileptogenic lesions in the brain.
Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of arterial spin-labeling in localizing the epileptic focus in the brain and the changes in the blood perfusion in these regions.
Our sources were the PubMed and EMBASE data bases.
English language studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin-labeling for detecting the epileptogenic zone up to July 2019 were included.
The symptomatogenic foci of seizures in the brain were determined and used as the references. The relevant studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The outcomes were evaluated using the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, and likelihood ratio.
Six studies that included 174 patients qualified for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.82), 0.35 (95% CI, 0.03-0.90), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.76), respectively. The accuracy of arterial spin-labeling for localizing the epileptic focus was 0.88 (accuracy in arterial spin-labeling/all perfusion changes in arterial spin-labeling) in cases of a positive arterial spin-labeling result. The epileptogenic zone exhibited hyperperfusion or hypoperfusion.
Only a few studies were enrolled due to the strict inclusion criteria.
Arterial spin-labeling can be used for assessing, monitoring, and reviewing, postoperatively, patients with epilepsy. Blood perfusion changes in the brain may be closely related to the seizure time and pattern.
需要一种非侵入性、安全且经济的成像技术来识别大脑中的致痫病变。
我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,评估动脉自旋标记术定位大脑癫痫灶及这些区域血流灌注变化的准确性。
我们的资料来源是 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库。
纳入评估动脉自旋标记术检测致痫区的诊断准确性的英语语言研究,截至 2019 年 7 月。
使用症状性癫痫灶作为参考来确定大脑中的致痫灶。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2 评估相关研究。使用汇总敏感性、汇总特异性、汇总准确性、诊断比值比、汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积和似然比来评估结果。
有 6 项研究纳入了 174 名患者,符合本荟萃分析的条件。汇总敏感性、汇总特异性和汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.74(95%置信区间,0.65-0.82)、0.35(95%置信区间,0.03-0.90)和 0.73(95%置信区间,0.69-0.76)。阳性动脉自旋标记结果时,动脉自旋标记术定位癫痫灶的准确性为 0.88(动脉自旋标记术阳性病例/动脉自旋标记术所有灌注变化)。致痫区表现为高灌注或低灌注。
由于严格的纳入标准,仅纳入了少数研究。
动脉自旋标记术可用于评估、监测和审查癫痫患者。大脑血流灌注变化可能与癫痫发作时间和模式密切相关。