Suppr超能文献

护士从业者住院医师和研究员计划的能力框架:比较、分析和建议。

Competency frameworks for nurse practitioner residency and fellowship programs: Comparison, analysis, and recommendations.

机构信息

Acute and Chronic Care Community, School of Nursing, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021 Mar 19;34(1):160-168. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000591.

Abstract

Nurse practitioner (NP) education has followed the pattern of other health professions in recent years to place an emphasis on competency-based education. In recent years, postgraduate NP residency/fellowship programs to achieve competence and successful transition to practice have emerged and flourished. Currently, there is no standard competency framework in use for NP residency/fellowship programs in the United States, despite numerous published frameworks available. This article aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of competency frameworks for NP education and to summarize and compare the competency frameworks used in NP education and residency/fellowship programs. Recommendations were sought for standardization of these competencies to create consistent evaluation and outcome measurements. Seven competency frameworks used across NP education and residency/fellowship programs were reviewed and compared in table format. Commonalities, differences, and themes were extracted from this comparison. There were more similarities than differences between the competency frameworks; however, common themes emerged as the emphasis on patient-centered, evidence-based practice, systems-based and quality improvement, and interprofessional practice and teamwork. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing Common Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Doctoral-Level Competencies, published in 2017, provided the most current, inclusive, comprehensive, and complete set of competencies for NPs at the time of graduation; however, they have not defined a progression indicator for postgraduate NP competency evaluation. This review of the competencies emphasizes (a) the need for consistent and consensus-based standards and (b) areas that NP education and residency/fellowship programs can strengthen to assess their ability to describe observable, measurable competencies. Instruments to evaluate competencies are recommended.

摘要

护士从业者(NP)教育近年来遵循其他健康专业的模式,强调以能力为基础的教育。近年来,研究生 NP 住院医师/研究员计划已出现并蓬勃发展,以实现能力并成功过渡到实践。尽管有许多已发表的框架,但目前在美国,没有用于 NP 住院医师/研究员计划的标准能力框架。本文旨在对 NP 教育的能力框架进行全面分析,并总结和比较 NP 教育和住院医师/研究员计划中使用的能力框架。寻求对这些能力进行标准化的建议,以创建一致的评估和结果测量。以表格形式审查和比较了在 NP 教育和住院医师/研究员计划中使用的七个能力框架。从比较中提取了共性、差异和主题。能力框架之间的相似之处多于差异;然而,共同的主题出现了,强调以患者为中心、循证实践、基于系统和质量改进以及跨专业实践和团队合作。2017 年发布的美国护理学院协会共同高级实践注册护士博士级别的能力,为当时的毕业护士提供了最当前、最全面、最完整的能力集;然而,他们没有定义研究生 NP 能力评估的进展指标。对这些能力的审查强调:(a)需要一致和基于共识的标准,以及(b)NP 教育和住院医师/研究员计划可以加强的领域,以评估他们描述可观察、可衡量的能力的能力。建议使用评估能力的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验