Suppr超能文献

药师主导的选择性审核和反馈对门诊尿路感染和皮肤软组织感染抗生素处方的影响。

Impact of pharmacist-led selective audit and feedback on outpatient antibiotic prescribing for UTIs and SSTIs.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

Division of Infectious Disease, Mercy Health Saint Mary's, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 May 24;78(Supplement_2):S62-S69. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab110.

Abstract

PURPOSE

An estimated 30% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. The Joint Commission, in 2016, implemented core elements of performance requiring antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to expand to outpatient practice settings. A study was conducted to determine whether pharmacist-led audit and feedback would improve antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTIs) at 2 primary care practices.

METHODS

A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was conducted to evaluate antibiotic prescribing for patients treated for a UTI or SSTI at 2 primary care offices (a family medicine office and an internal medicine office). The primary objective was to compare the rate of appropriate antibiotic prescribing to patients treated before implementation of a pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback process for reviewing antibiotics prescribed for UTIs and SSTIs (the pre-ASP group) and patients treated after process implementation (the post-ASP group). Total regimen appropriateness was defined by appropriate antibiotic selection, dose, duration, and therapy indication in accordance with institutional outpatient empiric therapy guidelines. Secondary objectives included comparing rates of infection-related revisits and Clostridioides difficile infection between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients were included in the study (pre-ASP group, n = 200; post-ASP group, n = 200). The rate of total antibiotic prescribing appropriateness improved significantly, from 27.5% to 50.5% (P < 0.0001), after implementation of the audit-and-feedback process. There were also significant improvements in the post-ASP group vs the pre-ASP period in the individual components of regimen appropriateness: appropriate drug (70% vs 53%, P < 0.001), appropriate duration (83.5% vs 57.5%, P < 0.001), and appropriate therapy indication (98% vs 94%, P = 0.041). There were no significant between-group differences in other outcomes such as rates of adverse events, treatment failure, C. difficile infection, and infection-related revisits or hospitalizations within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback outpatient stewardship strategy was demonstrated to achieve significant improvement in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for UTI and SSTI.

摘要

目的

据估计,美国所有门诊抗生素处方中有 30%是不必要的。2016 年,联合委员会实施了绩效的核心要素,要求抗菌药物管理项目 (ASPs) 扩展到门诊实践环境。本研究旨在确定药师主导的审核和反馈是否会改善两家初级保健诊所的尿路感染 (UTI) 和皮肤和软组织感染 (SSTI) 的抗生素处方。

方法

本回顾性、准实验研究评估了在两家初级保健办公室(家庭医学办公室和内科办公室)接受治疗的 UTI 或 SSTI 患者的抗生素处方。主要目的是比较在实施药师主导的审核和反馈流程之前(ASP 前组)和之后(ASP 后组)接受治疗的患者,评估治疗 UTI 和 SSTI 患者的抗生素处方的适当抗生素处方率。总方案的适当性通过根据机构门诊经验性治疗指南适当的抗生素选择、剂量、持续时间和治疗适应症来定义。次要目标包括比较两组之间与感染相关的复诊和艰难梭菌感染率。

结果

共有 400 名患者纳入研究(ASP 前组,n = 200;ASP 后组,n = 200)。在实施审核和反馈流程后,抗生素总处方适当性的比率从 27.5%显著提高到 50.5%(P < 0.0001)。在 ASP 后组与 ASP 前时期相比,方案适当性的各个组成部分也有显著改善:适当的药物(70% 对 53%,P < 0.001)、适当的持续时间(83.5% 对 57.5%,P < 0.001)和适当的治疗适应症(98% 对 94%,P = 0.041)。两组之间在其他结果方面没有显著差异,如不良事件、治疗失败、艰难梭菌感染、与感染相关的复诊或 30 天内住院率。

结论

本研究表明,药师主导的审核和反馈门诊管理策略可显著改善门诊 UTI 和 SSTI 的抗生素处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验