Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):623-630. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab125.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the addition of an aortic root replacement or sinus repair on mortality and morbidity during aortic arch repair.
A total of 2472 patients underwent proximal or total aortic arch repair with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2002 and 2018 at 12 centres. Multivariable logistic regressions (MV) and propensity score (PS) with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were performed.
A total of 1099 (44.5%) patients had additional aortic root replacement (n = 934) or sinus repair (n = 165). Those with aortic root interventions were younger (61 ± 13 vs 64 ± 13 years, P < 0.001) and had less females (23% vs 35%, P < 0.001), less dissection (31% vs 36%, P = 0.004), less urgent cases (35% vs 39%, P = 0.047), more connective tissue disease (7% vs 3%, P < 0.001) and less total arch replacements (14% vs 22%, P < 0.001). On adjusted analyses, the addition of aortic root procedure was associated with increased mortality [MV: odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.92; PS-IPTW: risk increased by 3.7%, 95% CI 1.2-6.3%, P = 0.004]. Reoperation for bleeding was also increased with the addition of aortic root intervention (MV: OR 1.48, 95% 1.10-1.99; PS-IPTW: risk increased by 3.2%, 95% CI 0.8-5.6%, P = 0.009). The risks of stroke and dialysis-dependent renal failure were similar. When looking only at non-elective cases, the increased risk of mortality was more pronounced (MV: OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.11-2.32, P = 0.013; PS-IPTW: risk increased by 6.8%, 95 CI 1.7-11.8%, P = 0.008, and a number need to harm of 15 patients to cause 1 additional death).
The addition of aortic root replacement or sinus repair during proximal or total aortic arch repair seems to increase postoperative mortality only in non-elective cases.
本研究旨在探讨在主动脉弓修复术中行主动脉根部置换或窦部修复术对死亡率和发病率的影响。
2002 年至 2018 年期间,在 12 家中心共对 2472 例患者进行了近端或全主动脉弓修复术,并采用低温体外循环。进行了多变量逻辑回归(MV)和倾向评分(PS)以及逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)分析。
共有 1099 例(44.5%)患者接受了额外的主动脉根部置换术(n=934)或窦部修复术(n=165)。行主动脉根部干预的患者更年轻(61±13 岁比 64±13 岁,P<0.001),女性比例较低(23%比 35%,P<0.001),夹层比例较低(31%比 36%,P=0.004),紧急情况比例较低(35%比 39%,P=0.047),结缔组织疾病比例较高(7%比 3%,P<0.001),全弓置换比例较低(14%比 22%,P<0.001)。在调整后的分析中,主动脉根部手术的附加与死亡率增加相关[MV:比值比(OR)1.41,95%置信区间(CI)1.03-1.92;PS-IPTW:风险增加 3.7%,95%CI 1.2-6.3%,P=0.004]。由于出血而再次手术的风险也随着主动脉根部干预的增加而增加(MV:OR 1.48,95%CI 1.10-1.99;PS-IPTW:风险增加 3.2%,95%CI 0.8-5.6%,P=0.009)。中风和依赖透析的肾功能衰竭的风险相似。当仅观察非紧急病例时,死亡率增加的风险更为明显(MV:OR 1.60,95%CI 1.11-2.32,P=0.013;PS-IPTW:风险增加 6.8%,95%CI 1.7-11.8%,P=0.008,需要 15 例患者才能增加 1 例额外死亡)。
在近端或全主动脉弓修复术中行主动脉根部置换或窦部修复术似乎仅会增加非紧急病例的术后死亡率。