Suppr超能文献

探索撒哈拉以南非洲差异化艾滋病毒服务提供时代的可持续性:系统评价。

Exploring Sustainability in the Era of Differentiated HIV Service Delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Primary Care and Public health, Imperial College, National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, North West London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Aug 1;87(4):1055-1071. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002688.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization recommends differentiated service delivery (DSD) to support resource-limited health systems in providing patient-centered HIV care. DSD offers alternative care models to clinic-based care for people living with HIV who are stable on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite good patient-related outcomes, there is limited evidence of their sustainability. Our review evaluated the reporting of sustainability indicators of DSD interventions conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies conducted between 2000 and 2019 assessing DSD interventions targeting HIV-positive individuals who are established in ART in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated them through a comprehensive sustainability framework of constructs categorized into 6 domains (intervention design, process, external environment, resources, organizational setting, and people involvement). We scored each construct 1, 2, or 3 for no, partial, or sufficient level of evidence, respectively. Interventions with a calculated sustainability score (overall and domain-specific) of >90% or domain-specific median score >2.7 were considered likely to be sustainable.

RESULTS

Overall scores ranged from 69% to 98%. Top scoring intervention types included adherence clubs (98%) and community ART groups (95%) which comprised more than half of interventions. The highest scoring domains were design (2.9) and organizational setting (2.8). The domains of resources (2.4) and people involvement (2.3) scored lowest revealing potential areas for improvement to support DSD sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

With the right investment in stakeholder involvement and domestic funding, DSD models generally show potential for sustainability. Our results could guide informed decisions on which DSD intervention is likely to be sustainable per setting and highlight areas that could motivate further research.

摘要

简介

世界卫生组织建议差异化服务提供(DSD),以支持资源有限的卫生系统为接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的艾滋病毒感染者提供以患者为中心的艾滋病毒护理。DSD 为接受 ART 治疗稳定的艾滋病毒感染者提供了替代以诊所为基础的护理的护理模式。尽管患者相关结果良好,但可持续性的证据有限。我们的审查评估了在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)进行的 DSD 干预措施的可持续性指标的报告。

方法

我们在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上搜索了 2000 年至 2019 年期间进行的评估针对在撒哈拉以南非洲接受 ART 的艾滋病毒阳性个体的 DSD 干预措施的研究。我们通过一个综合的可持续性框架对其进行评估,该框架将结构分为 6 个领域(干预设计、过程、外部环境、资源、组织环境和人员参与)。我们分别为每个结构打 1、2 或 3 分,分别表示没有、部分或充分的证据。计算出的可持续性得分(总体和特定领域)>90%或特定领域中位数得分>2.7 的干预措施被认为可能具有可持续性。

结果

总体得分范围从 69%到 98%。得分最高的干预类型包括遵医俱乐部(98%)和社区 ART 小组(95%),占干预措施的一半以上。得分最高的领域是设计(2.9)和组织环境(2.8)。资源(2.4)和人员参与(2.3)领域得分最低,这表明需要改进以支持 DSD 的可持续性。

结论

在利益相关者参与和国内资金方面进行适当投资,DSD 模式通常具有可持续性的潜力。我们的研究结果可以为每个环境中哪种 DSD 干预措施可能具有可持续性提供信息,并突出可能激发进一步研究的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8219088/fd14f18aed07/qai-87-1055-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验