Suppr超能文献

无左束支传导阻滞患者接受心脏再同步治疗后发生室性心律失常事件的危险因素。

Risk factors for ventricular tachyarrhythmic events in patients without left bundle branch block who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Jul;26(4):e12847. doi: 10.1111/anec.12847. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be pro-arrhythmic in patients with non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB). We hypothesized that combined assessment of risk factors (RF) for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) can be used to stratify non-LBBB patients for CRT implantation.

METHODS

The study comprised 412 non-LBBB patients from MADIT-CRT randomized to CRT-D (n = 215) versus ICD only (n = 197). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify RF associated with increased VTA risk in CRT-D patients without LBBB. The primary end point was first occurrence of sustained VTA during follow-up. Secondary end points included VTA/death and appropriate shock.

RESULTS

Four RFs were associated with increased VTA risk: blood urea nitrogen >25mg/dl, ejection fraction <20%, prior nonsustained VT, and female gender. Among CRT-D patients, 114 (53%) had no RF, while 101 (47%) had ≥1 RF. The 4-year cumulative probability of VTA was higher among those with ≥1 RF compared with those without RF (40% vs. 14%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that in patients without RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a 61% reduction in VTA compared with ICD-only therapy (p = .002), whereas among patients with ≥1 RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a corresponding 73% (p = .025) risk increase. Consistent results were observed when the secondary end points of VTA/death and appropriate ICD shocks were assessed.

CONCLUSION

Combined assessment of factors associated with increased risk for VTA can be used for improved selection of non-LBBB patients for CRT-D.

摘要

简介

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可能对非左束支传导阻滞(non-LBBB)患者有致心律失常作用。我们假设,对室性心动过速(VTAs)危险因素(RF)的综合评估可用于对非 LBBB 患者进行 CRT 植入分层。

方法

这项研究纳入了 MADIT-CRT 随机分组为 CRT-D(n=215)与 ICD 组(n=197)的 412 例非 LBBB 患者。采用最佳子集回归分析确定与非 LBBB 患者 CRT-D 后 VTAs 风险增加相关的 RF。主要终点为随访期间首次发生持续性 VTAs。次要终点包括 VTAs/死亡和适当的电击。

结果

有 4 个 RF 与 VTAs 风险增加相关:血尿素氮>25mg/dl、射血分数<20%、既往非持续性 VT 以及女性。在 CRT-D 患者中,114 例(53%)无 RF,101 例(47%)有≥1 个 RF。≥1 个 RF 的 CRT-D 患者 4 年累积 VTAs 发生率高于无 RF 患者(40%比 14%,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,在无 RF 的患者中,与 ICD 组相比,CRT-D 治疗与 VTAs 减少 61%相关(p=0.002),而在有≥1 个 RF 的患者中,与 ICD 组相比,CRT-D 治疗与 VTAs 相应增加 73%相关(p=0.025)。当评估次要终点 VTAs/死亡和适当 ICD 电击时,观察到了一致的结果。

结论

对与 VTAs 风险增加相关的因素进行综合评估,可用于改善对 CRT-D 非 LBBB 患者的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ac3/8293612/efa1e91b77cb/ANEC-26-e12847-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验