Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Jul;26(4):e12847. doi: 10.1111/anec.12847. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be pro-arrhythmic in patients with non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB). We hypothesized that combined assessment of risk factors (RF) for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) can be used to stratify non-LBBB patients for CRT implantation.
The study comprised 412 non-LBBB patients from MADIT-CRT randomized to CRT-D (n = 215) versus ICD only (n = 197). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify RF associated with increased VTA risk in CRT-D patients without LBBB. The primary end point was first occurrence of sustained VTA during follow-up. Secondary end points included VTA/death and appropriate shock.
Four RFs were associated with increased VTA risk: blood urea nitrogen >25mg/dl, ejection fraction <20%, prior nonsustained VT, and female gender. Among CRT-D patients, 114 (53%) had no RF, while 101 (47%) had ≥1 RF. The 4-year cumulative probability of VTA was higher among those with ≥1 RF compared with those without RF (40% vs. 14%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that in patients without RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a 61% reduction in VTA compared with ICD-only therapy (p = .002), whereas among patients with ≥1 RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a corresponding 73% (p = .025) risk increase. Consistent results were observed when the secondary end points of VTA/death and appropriate ICD shocks were assessed.
Combined assessment of factors associated with increased risk for VTA can be used for improved selection of non-LBBB patients for CRT-D.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可能对非左束支传导阻滞(non-LBBB)患者有致心律失常作用。我们假设,对室性心动过速(VTAs)危险因素(RF)的综合评估可用于对非 LBBB 患者进行 CRT 植入分层。
这项研究纳入了 MADIT-CRT 随机分组为 CRT-D(n=215)与 ICD 组(n=197)的 412 例非 LBBB 患者。采用最佳子集回归分析确定与非 LBBB 患者 CRT-D 后 VTAs 风险增加相关的 RF。主要终点为随访期间首次发生持续性 VTAs。次要终点包括 VTAs/死亡和适当的电击。
有 4 个 RF 与 VTAs 风险增加相关:血尿素氮>25mg/dl、射血分数<20%、既往非持续性 VT 以及女性。在 CRT-D 患者中,114 例(53%)无 RF,101 例(47%)有≥1 个 RF。≥1 个 RF 的 CRT-D 患者 4 年累积 VTAs 发生率高于无 RF 患者(40%比 14%,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,在无 RF 的患者中,与 ICD 组相比,CRT-D 治疗与 VTAs 减少 61%相关(p=0.002),而在有≥1 个 RF 的患者中,与 ICD 组相比,CRT-D 治疗与 VTAs 相应增加 73%相关(p=0.025)。当评估次要终点 VTAs/死亡和适当 ICD 电击时,观察到了一致的结果。
对与 VTAs 风险增加相关的因素进行综合评估,可用于改善对 CRT-D 非 LBBB 患者的选择。