Department of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, via Tre Martiri, Rovigo, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):e171-e178. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux362.
Right bundle branch block (RBBB) typically presents with only delayed right ventricular activation. However, some patients with RBBB develop concomitant delayed left ventricular (LV) activation. Such patients may show a specific electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern resembling RBBB in the precordial leads in association with an insignificant S-wave in lateral limb leads (atypical RBBB). We therefore postulated that the ECG pattern of atypical RBBB might be able to identify a subgroup of patients likely to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of RBBB ECG morphology on CRT response in patients with heart failure (HF).
We evaluated the echocardiographic clinical response of 66 patients with RBBB treated with CRT and followed up for almost 2 years. The patients were divided electrocardiographically into 2 groups: 31 with typical RBBB and 35 with atypical RBBB. Responders were classified in terms of reduction in LV end-systolic volume index (ESVi) ≥ 15% or reduction in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class ≥ 1 or Packer score variation (NYHA response with no HF-related hospitalization events or death). The atypical RBBB group presented a longer LV activation time compared with the typical RBBB group (111.9 ± 17.6 vs. 73.2 ± 15.4 ms; P < 0.001). In the atypical and typical RBBB groups, respectively, 71.4% and 19.4% of patients were ESVi responders (P = 0.001) 74.3% and 32.3% were NYHA responders (P = 0.002); similarly, 71.4% and 29.0% of patients exhibited a 2-year Packer score of 0 (P = 0.002).
Patients with atypical RBBB, which is a pattern highly suggestive of concomitant delayed LV conduction, may show a satisfactory response to CRT.
右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)通常仅表现为右心室激活延迟。然而,一些 RBBB 患者会出现同时延迟的左心室(LV)激活。此类患者可能在胸前导联出现类似于 RBBB 的特定心电图(ECG)模式,同时在外侧肢体导联出现 S 波不明显(非典型 RBBB)。因此,我们假设非典型 RBBB 的心电图模式可能能够识别出对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)有反应的亚组患者。本研究旨在评估 RBBB 心电图形态对心力衰竭(HF)患者 CRT 反应的影响。
我们评估了 66 例接受 CRT 治疗并随访近 2 年的 RBBB 患者的超声心动图临床反应。根据心电图将患者分为 2 组:31 例为典型 RBBB,35 例为非典型 RBBB。根据左心室收缩末期容积指数(LVESVi)减少≥15%或纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级改善≥1 级或 Packer 评分变化(NYHA 反应且无 HF 相关住院事件或死亡)来分类应答者。与典型 RBBB 组相比,非典型 RBBB 组的 LV 激活时间更长(111.9±17.6 vs. 73.2±15.4 ms;P<0.001)。在非典型和典型 RBBB 组中,LVESVi 应答者分别为 71.4%和 19.4%(P=0.001);NYHA 应答者分别为 74.3%和 32.3%(P=0.002);同样,2 年时 Packer 评分为 0 的患者分别为 71.4%和 29.0%(P=0.002)。
非典型 RBBB 模式高度提示同时存在延迟的 LV 传导,可能对 CRT 有满意的反应。