Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚未覆盖牛厩堆肥中饲养方式和粪肥质量对 CH 和 NO 排放的影响。

Effect of feeding practices and manure quality on CH and NO emissions from uncovered cattle manure heaps in Kenya.

机构信息

Mazingira Centre, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 30709, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya.

Mazingira Centre, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 30709, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya; Trinity College Dublin, Department of Botany, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:209-220. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

Abstract

Countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rely on IPCC emission factors (EF) for GHG emission reporting. However, these were derived for industrialized livestock farms and do not represent conditions of smallholder farms (small, low-producing livestock breeds, poor feed quality, feed scarcity). Here, we present the first measurements of CH and NO emissions from cattle-manure heaps representing feeding practices typical for smallholder farms in the highlands of East Africa: 1) cattle fed below maintenance energy requirements to represent feed scarcity, and 2) cattle fed tropical forage grasses (Napier, Rhodes, Brachiaria). Sub-maintenance feeding reduced cumulative manure NO emissions compared to cattle receiving sufficient feed but did not change EF. Sub-maintenance feeding did not affect cumulative manure CH emissions or EF. When cattle were fed tropical forage grasses, cumulative manure NO emissions did not differ between diets, but manure EF from Brachiaria and Rhodes diets were lower than the IPCC EF for solid storage (1%, 2019 Refinement of IPCC Guidelines). Manure CH emissions were lower in the Rhodes grass diet than when feeding Napier or Brachiaria, and manure EF from all three grasses were lower than the IPCC default (4.4 gCHkg VS, 2019 Refinement of IPCC Guidelines). Regression analysis revealed that manure N concentration and C:N were important drivers of NO emissions, with low N concentrations and high C:N reducing NO emissions. Our results show that IPCC EFs overestimate excreta GHG emissions, which calls for additional measurements to develop localized EFs for smallholder livestock systems in SSA.

摘要

撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的国家依赖于 IPCC 排放因子(EF)来报告温室气体排放。然而,这些因子是针对工业化的牲畜农场得出的,不能代表小农农场的情况(规模小、生产能力低的牲畜品种、饲料质量差、饲料短缺)。在这里,我们首次测量了代表东非高地小农农场典型饲养方式的牛粪堆中 CH 和 NO 的排放:1)以低于维持能量需求的方式喂养牛,以代表饲料短缺;2)以热带牧草(象草、皇竹草、杂交狼尾草)喂养牛。与接受充足饲料的牛相比,低于维持水平的喂养减少了累积的粪便 NO 排放,但没有改变 EF。低于维持水平的喂养不会影响累积的粪便 CH 排放或 EF。当牛被喂食热带牧草时,不同饲料之间的粪便 NO 排放没有差异,但 Brachiaria 和 Rhodes 饲料的粪便 EF 低于 IPCC 对固体储存的 EF(2019 年 IPCC 指南修订版)。与喂养象草或皇竹草相比,Rhodes 草饮食中的粪便 CH 排放量较低,所有三种草的粪便 EF 均低于 IPCC 默认值(2019 年 IPCC 指南修订版)。回归分析表明,粪便 N 浓度和 C:N 是 NO 排放的重要驱动因素,低 N 浓度和高 C:N 会减少 NO 排放。我们的结果表明,IPCC EF 高估了排泄物的温室气体排放,这需要进行更多的测量,以制定针对 SSA 小农牲畜系统的本地化 EF。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验