Serviço de Cardiologia, Departamento Coração E Vasos, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, CAML, CCUL, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
J Sports Sci. 2021 Aug;39(16):1893-1902. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1907062. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
We compared the impact of a one-year periodized exercise training versus a non-periodized exercise training on health-related physical fitness (HRPF) including body composition, cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fifty CAD patients (60.4 ± 9.9 years) were randomized to either a periodized training group (PG) (n = 25) or a non-periodized training group (NPG) (n = 25). Both consisted of a combined training programme, performed 3 days/week for 12 months. Thirty-six CAD patients (PG: n = 18, NPG: n = 18) successfully completed the exercise regimes. In both groups, a favourable main effect for time was evident for peak VO, peak workload, anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point workloads and VO, whole body skeletal muscle mass and quality index at 12 months.In conclusion, a periodized model is as effective as a non-periodized model in promoting increases in HRPF outcomes following a one-year intervention. These findings indicate that health-professionals can add variation to cardiac rehabilitation workouts without compromising effectiveness.
我们比较了为期一年的周期性运动训练与非周期性运动训练对冠心病患者健康相关体适能（HRPF）的影响，包括身体成分、心肺和肌肉健康。50 名冠心病患者（60.4±9.9 岁）被随机分为周期性训练组（PG）（n=25）或非周期性训练组（NPG）（n=25）。两组均采用联合训练方案，每周进行 3 天，持续 12 个月。36 名冠心病患者（PG：n=18，NPG：n=18）成功完成了运动方案。在两组中，12 个月时，峰值 VO、峰值工作量、无氧阈和呼吸补偿点工作量以及 VO、全身骨骼肌质量和质量指数的主要时间效应均有利。结论：在为期一年的干预后，周期性模型与非周期性模型一样有效，可促进 HRPF 结果的提高。这些发现表明，健康专业人员可以在不影响效果的情况下为心脏康复锻炼增加变化。
