Thakore Sakshi, Kundra Pankaj, Garg Rakesh
Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):210-215. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_948_19. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
This study assesses the extubation practices of anaesthesiologists and whether these practices differ from existing guidelines.
The literature related to tracheal extubation was searched and a validated questionnaire was designed to assess practices of tracheal extubation. The questionnaire included techniques, manoeuvres, preparation, timing and plan of extubation. The survey link was shared with eligible participants. The responses were assessed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.
Of the 1264 respondents, 66.8% keep difficult airway cart ready only when difficult extubation is anticipated. Only 12.3% of respondents perform deep extubation with supraglottic airway device (SAD) exchange while 73.3% of respondents perform awake extubation with pharmacological control for preventing haemodynamic fluctuations. In the case of anticipated difficult extubation, 48.3% anaesthesiologists prefer the airway exchange catheter (AEC) exchange technique. Of all, 84.8% anaesthesiologists administer 100% oxygen before performing extubation and 81.7% continue to oxygenate during and 83.9% provide oxygen after extubation in all patients. In the case of suspected airway edema or collapse or surgical cause for airway compromise, 70% anaesthesiologists perform a leak test. The most preferred plan of extubation in patients with suspected airway collapse after surgery is direct extubation in fully awake position (54.6%). In patients with anticipated difficult extubation, 50.8% anaesthesiologists prefer to ventilate for 24 hours and reassess.
We observed that the extubation practices vary widely among anaesthesiologists. Almost half of the anaesthesiologists were unaware of extubation guidelines.
本研究评估麻醉医生的拔管操作,以及这些操作是否与现有指南存在差异。
检索与气管拔管相关的文献,并设计一份经过验证的问卷来评估气管拔管操作。问卷包括技术、手法、准备、时机和拔管计划。调查链接分发给符合条件的参与者。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)对回复进行评估。
在1264名受访者中,66.8%的人仅在预计拔管困难时才准备好困难气道车。只有12.3%的受访者在使用声门上气道装置(SAD)更换时进行深拔管,而73.3%的受访者进行清醒拔管并采用药物控制以防止血流动力学波动。在预计拔管困难的情况下,48.3%的麻醉医生更喜欢气道交换导管(AEC)更换技术。总体而言,84.8%的麻醉医生在拔管前给予100%氧气,81.7%的人在拔管期间持续给氧,83.9%的人在所有患者拔管后提供氧气。在怀疑气道水肿或塌陷或存在气道受损的手术原因时,70%的麻醉医生进行漏气试验。术后怀疑气道塌陷患者最常用的拔管计划是在完全清醒状态下直接拔管(54.6%)。在预计拔管困难的患者中,50.