• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

≥65 岁患者四肢游离皮瓣重建:单中心回顾性 1:1 配对分析。

Free Flap Reconstruction of the Extremities in Patients Who are ≥65 Years Old: A Single-Center Retrospective 1-to-1 Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Mar 18;16:497-503. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S300558. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S300558
PMID:33776427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7987263/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Demographic changes are leading to population aging, and free flap reconstructions for various indications are expected to become increasingly common among older patients. Therefore, this study evaluated free flap reconstruction of the extremities in older patients and compared the outcomes to those from younger patients who underwent similar procedures during the same period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study used a case-control design to compare older and younger patients who underwent free flap reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the extremities. One-to-one matching was performed for older patients (≥65 years) and younger patients (≤64 years) according to indication, flap recipient site, and flap type. The parameters of interest were clinico-demographic characteristics, flap type, defect location, indication for free flap reconstruction, number of venous anastomoses, and postoperative complications (flap loss, infection, and wound healing disorders).

RESULTS

The study included 48 older patients and 133 younger patients, with a mean follow-up of 12 months after discharge. The free flap reconstruction was performed at a mean interval of 19.8±22.8 days (range: 0-88 days). The 1:1 matching created 38 pairs of patients, which revealed no significant differences in the rates of flap necrosis and flap failure.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to detect a significant age-related difference in the flap necrosis rate after free flap reconstruction of extremity defects. Therefore, with careful perioperative management and patient selection, microsurgical free flap reconstruction is a feasible option for older patients.

摘要

目的

人口结构变化导致人口老龄化,各种适应证的游离皮瓣重建预计将在老年患者中越来越常见。因此,本研究评估了老年患者的肢体游离皮瓣重建,并将其结果与同期接受类似手术的年轻患者进行比较。

患者和方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,采用病例对照设计比较了接受肢体软组织缺损游离皮瓣重建的老年和年轻患者。根据适应证、皮瓣受区和皮瓣类型,对老年患者(≥65 岁)和年轻患者(≤64 岁)进行一对一匹配。感兴趣的参数包括临床-人口统计学特征、皮瓣类型、缺损部位、游离皮瓣重建适应证、静脉吻合术数量以及术后并发症(皮瓣坏死、感染和伤口愈合障碍)。

结果

研究纳入了 48 例老年患者和 133 例年轻患者,出院后平均随访 12 个月。游离皮瓣重建的平均间隔为 19.8±22.8 天(范围:0-88 天)。1:1 匹配创建了 38 对患者,两组皮瓣坏死率和皮瓣失败率无显著差异。

结论

本研究未发现肢体缺陷游离皮瓣重建后皮瓣坏死率与年龄相关的显著差异。因此,通过仔细的围手术期管理和患者选择,显微外科游离皮瓣重建是老年患者的可行选择。

相似文献

1
Free Flap Reconstruction of the Extremities in Patients Who are ≥65 Years Old: A Single-Center Retrospective 1-to-1 Matched Analysis.≥65 岁患者四肢游离皮瓣重建:单中心回顾性 1:1 配对分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Mar 18;16:497-503. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S300558. eCollection 2021.
2
The keystone island flap: use in large defects of the trunk and extremities in soft-tissue reconstruction.顶石岛皮瓣:在躯干和四肢软组织重建中用于大型缺陷。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1212-1221. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f36f.
3
Free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in extremities of children.游离腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣修复儿童四肢软组织缺损
Microsurgery. 2013 Nov;33(8):612-9. doi: 10.1002/micr.22127. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
Matched Comparison of Microsurgical Anastomoses Performed with Loupe Magnification versus Operating Microscope in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction.显微镜放大下与手术显微镜下吻合在创伤下肢重建中的配对比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):235-240. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006381.
5
Role of microsurgical free flap reconstruction in managing complex wound: a retrospective cross-sectional study.显微游离皮瓣重建术在复杂创面处理中的作用:回顾性横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Dec 30;43:211. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.211.36595. eCollection 2022.
6
Anterolateral thigh free flap for "head-to-toe" reconstruction.股前外侧游离皮瓣用于“从头到脚”重建。
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):530-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182090a82.
7
Free perforator flaps vs propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: A cost/effectiveness analysis on a series of 179 cases.游离穿支皮瓣与桨式皮瓣在下肢重建中的应用:179 例系列病例的成本/效果分析。
Injury. 2019 Dec;50 Suppl 5:S11-S16. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.039. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Results of combined vascular reconstruction by means of AV loops and free flap transfer in patients with soft tissue defects.应用动静脉袢及游离皮瓣移植联合血管重建治疗软组织缺损患者的结果
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Apr;69(4):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.025. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
An effective method to access recipient vessels outside the zone of injury in free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity.一种在下肢游离皮瓣重建中获取损伤区域外受区血管的有效方法。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S136-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000202.
10
One versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular lower extremity reconstruction using gracilis muscle or anterolateral thigh flaps.在使用股薄肌或股前外侧皮瓣进行下肢微血管重建中,单静脉吻合与双静脉吻合的比较
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2828-2832. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative free flap monitoring in reconstructive surgery-man or machine?重建手术中术后游离皮瓣监测——人工还是机器?
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 22;10:1130566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1130566. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The AO triangular external fixator: a backup option in the treatment of ankle fractures in geriatric patients?AO 外固定架:老年患者踝关节骨折治疗的后备选择?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 May;31(4):719-727. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02740-0. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Comparison of Fasciocutaneous and Muscle-based Free Flaps for Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity.用于上肢软组织重建的筋膜皮瓣和肌皮瓣游离皮瓣的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 31;7(12):e2543. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002543. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Anesthetic management of geriatric patients.老年患者的麻醉管理。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Feb;73(1):8-29. doi: 10.4097/kja.19391. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Lower Extremity.下肢的显微外科重建
Semin Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;33(1):54-58. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677878. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
5
Managing complex trauma injuries in the elderly: a case report of a free flap and circular frame in a 95-year old patient with an open IIIB tibial fracture.老年复杂创伤性损伤的处理:一例95岁开放性ⅢB型胫骨骨折患者的游离皮瓣及环形外固定架治疗病例报告
Eur J Plast Surg. 2018;41(4):475-478. doi: 10.1007/s00238-018-1405-4. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Optimizing venous outflow in reconstruction of Gustilo IIIB lower extremity traumas with soft tissue free flap coverage: Are two veins better than one?在采用游离软组织瓣覆盖修复Gustilo IIIB型下肢创伤时优化静脉流出道:两条静脉是否优于一条?
Microsurgery. 2018 Oct;38(7):745-751. doi: 10.1002/micr.30271. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Soft Tissue Coverage in Distal Lower Extremity Open Fractures: Comparison of Free Anterolateral Thigh and Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps.下肢远端开放性骨折的软组织覆盖:游离股前外侧皮瓣与背阔肌皮瓣的比较
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Feb;34(2):121-129. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607323. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Does Postoperative Anticoagulation Therapy Lead to a Higher Success Rate for Microvascular Free-Tissue Transfer in the Head and Neck? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.术后抗凝治疗是否会提高头颈部游离微血管组织移植的成功率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Feb;34(2):87-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606346. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
The systematic review and meta-analysis of free flap safety in the elderly patients.老年患者游离皮瓣安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Microsurgery. 2017 Jul;37(5):442-450. doi: 10.1002/micr.30156. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Practical Management of Anaesthesia in the Elderly.老年人麻醉的实际管理
Drugs Aging. 2016 Nov;33(11):765-777. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0413-y.