Department of Psychiatry, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia.
Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York Medical College.
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2020 Winter;48(4):363-391. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2020.48.4.363.
Five months following an earlier report on the initial impact of COVID-19, the same 24 contributing psychodynamic psychiatrists reported on how matters have shifted in their experience. Spread of the virus, lockdowns, politicization of all aspects of the pandemic, massive unemployment, and social justice frustrations have characterized the interim. The initial burst of acute uncertainty and worry has shifted into a more adaptive but still destabilizing long-term apprehension: distance treatment and its ramifications have become somewhat normalized, training now incorporates virtual treatment approaches, psychodynamically informed counseling has taken a larger role in the content of care. New theories of clinical practice are emerging that address these changes. As before, contributors' narratives are considered from the perspective of administration and training, structure and content of treatment, and the impact of the pandemic both on patients and psychiatrists.
五个月前,我们曾就 COVID-19 疫情初期的影响进行了报告,当时的 24 位参与的精神动力精神科医生报告了他们的经验发生了哪些变化。病毒的传播、封锁、大流行各个方面的政治化、大规模失业以及社会正义的挫败感是这一时期的特点。最初急性的不确定性和担忧已经转变为一种更适应但仍然不稳定的长期担忧:远程治疗及其后果已经变得有些正常化,培训现在纳入了虚拟治疗方法,精神动力学咨询在护理内容中扮演了更重要的角色。正在出现新的临床实践理论来应对这些变化。与之前一样,我们从管理和培训、治疗的结构和内容以及大流行对患者和精神科医生的影响这三个角度来考虑参与者的叙述。