Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Thyroid. 2021 Sep;31(9):1383-1390. doi: 10.1089/thy.2021.0033. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
Current guidelines recommend against thyrotropin (TSH) suppression in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients; however, physician practices remain underexplored. Our objective was to understand treating physicians' approach to TSH suppression in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Endocrinologists and surgeons identified by thyroid cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries of Georgia and Los Angeles were surveyed in 2018-2019. Physicians were asked to report how likely they were to recommend TSH suppression (i.e., TSH <0.5 mIU/L) in three clinical scenarios: patients with intermediate-risk, low-risk, and very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Responses were measured on a 4-point Likert scale (extremely unlikely to extremely likely). Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine physician characteristics associated with recommending TSH suppression in each of the aforementioned scenarios. Response rate was 69% (448/654). Overall, 80.4% of physicians were likely/extremely likely to recommend TSH suppression for a patient with an intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer, 48.8% for a patient with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer, and 29.7% for a patient with very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Surgeons were less likely to recommend TSH suppression for an intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer patient (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.19-0.69]) compared with endocrinologists. Physicians with higher thyroid cancer patient volume were less likely to suppress TSH in low-risk and very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients (i.e., >40 patients per year, OR = 0.53 [CI 0.30-0.96]; OR = 0.49 [CI 0.24-0.99], respectively, compared with 0-20 patients per year). Physicians who estimated higher likelihood of recurrence were more likely to suppress TSH in a patient with very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (OR = 2.34 [CI 1.91-4.59]). Many patients with low-risk thyroid cancer continue to be treated with suppressive doses of thyroid hormone, emphasizing the need for more high-quality research to guide thyroid cancer management, as well as better understanding of barriers that hinder guideline adoption.
目前的指南建议低危分化型甲状腺癌患者不应进行促甲状腺激素(TSH)抑制;然而,医生的治疗实践仍未得到充分探索。我们的目的是了解治疗医生在甲状腺乳头状癌患者中对 TSH 抑制的治疗方法。2018 年至 2019 年,内分泌学家和外科医生通过佐治亚州和洛杉矶的监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处的甲状腺癌患者进行了调查。医生被要求在三种临床情况下报告他们推荐 TSH 抑制(即 TSH<0.5 mIU/L)的可能性:中危、低危和极低危甲状腺乳头状癌患者。反应是在 4 分李克特量表上进行测量(极不可能到极有可能)。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与上述每种情况下推荐 TSH 抑制相关的医生特征。应答率为 69%(448/654)。总的来说,80.4%的医生可能/极有可能为中危甲状腺乳头状癌患者推荐 TSH 抑制,48.8%的医生为低危甲状腺乳头状癌患者推荐 TSH 抑制,29.7%的医生为极低危甲状腺乳头状癌患者推荐 TSH 抑制。与内分泌医生相比,外科医生不太可能为中危甲状腺乳头状癌患者推荐 TSH 抑制(比值比[OR] = 0.36 [95%置信区间,CI,0.19-0.69])。甲状腺癌患者数量较高的医生不太可能抑制低危和极低危甲状腺乳头状癌患者的 TSH(即每年>40 例患者,OR = 0.53 [CI 0.30-0.96];OR = 0.49 [CI 0.24-0.99],与每年 0-20 例患者相比)。估计复发可能性较高的医生更有可能抑制极低危甲状腺乳头状癌患者的 TSH(OR = 2.34 [CI 1.91-4.59])。许多低危甲状腺癌患者仍接受抑制剂量的甲状腺激素治疗,这强调需要更多高质量的研究来指导甲状腺癌管理,以及更好地了解阻碍指南采用的障碍。