• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉支架与传统支架治疗血液透析患者中心静脉阻塞:一项回顾性研究。

Venous stent versus conventional stent for the treatment of central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/02841851211005163. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1177/02841851211005163
PMID:33779305
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment is a first-line treatment for upper thoracic central vein obstruction (CVO). Few studies using bare venous stents (BVS) in CVO have been conducted.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment performance of upper thoracic central vein stenosis between BVS and conventional bare stent (CBS) in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Hemodialysis patients with upper thoracic central vein obstruction who underwent endovascular treatment at the interventional unit of our institution from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018 were enrolled in the present study. CBS was used to treat central vein obstruction in 43 patients and BVS in 34 patients. We compared the primary patency rates and complications between the two stent types. values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The patient demographic data between the CBS and BVS groups were similar. The characteristics of the lesions, procedures, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups ( > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences of primary patency rates at three and six months between the BVS and CBS groups (94.1% vs. 86.0% and 73.5% vs. 58.1%, respectively;  > 0.05). The primary patency rate at 12 months in the BVS group was significantly higher than that in the CBS group (61.8% vs. 32.6%;  = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of central vein obstruction with BVS provided a higher primary patency rate at 12 months than CBS.

摘要

背景

血管内治疗是治疗上胸段中心静脉阻塞(CVO)的一线治疗方法。很少有研究使用裸静脉支架(BVS)治疗 CVO。

目的

评估 BVS 和传统裸支架(CBS)在上胸段中心静脉狭窄治疗中的疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日在我院介入科接受血管内治疗的上胸段中心静脉阻塞的血液透析患者。43 例患者采用 CBS 治疗中心静脉阻塞,34 例患者采用 BVS 治疗。比较两种支架类型的初始通畅率和并发症。 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

CBS 组和 BVS 组患者的人口统计学数据相似。两组患者的病变特征、手术过程和并发症无明显差异( >0.05)。BVS 组和 CBS 组在 3 个月和 6 个月的初始通畅率无统计学差异(94.1%比 86.0%和 73.5%比 58.1%; >0.05)。BVS 组 12 个月的初始通畅率明显高于 CBS 组(61.8%比 32.6%; =0.008)。

结论

与 CBS 相比,BVS 治疗中心静脉阻塞的初始通畅率在 12 个月时更高。

相似文献

1
Venous stent versus conventional stent for the treatment of central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study.静脉支架与传统支架治疗血液透析患者中心静脉阻塞:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Radiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/02841851211005163. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
Long-term results of angioplasty and stent placement for treatment of central venous obstruction in 126 hemodialysis patients: a 10-year single-center experience.126 例血液透析患者中心静脉阻塞经血管成形术和支架置入治疗的 10 年单中心经验:长期结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1672-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2654.
3
Central venous occlusion in hemodialysis access: Comparison between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone and nitinol or stainless-steel stent placement.血液透析通路中的中心静脉阻塞:单纯经皮腔内血管成形术与镍钛诺或不锈钢支架置入的比较。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Sep;100(9):485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Stent Grafts Provided Superior Primary Patency for Central Venous Stenosis Treatment in Comparison with Angioplasty and Bare Metal Stent: A Retrospective Single Center Study on 70 Hemodialysis Patients.与血管成形术和裸金属支架相比,覆膜支架在治疗中心静脉狭窄方面具有更高的初始通畅率:一项针对70例血液透析患者的回顾性单中心研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 May;50(4):221-30. doi: 10.1177/1538574416639149. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Efficacy of covered stent placement for central venous occlusive disease in hemodialysis patients.覆膜支架置入治疗血液透析患者中心静脉闭塞性疾病的疗效。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):754-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.260. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Stent-Graft Length Is Associated with Decreased Patency in Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients.支架移植物长度与血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄治疗中通畅率降低相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
Percutaneous treatment of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients: long-term outcomes.血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄的经皮治疗:长期疗效
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Mar;32(2):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9511-0. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
8
Symptomatic superior vena cava syndrome in hemodialysis patients: mid-term results of primary stenting.血液透析患者的症状性上腔静脉综合征:原发性支架置入的中期结果
Semin Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;29(4):186-191. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
Long-term results of stent-graft placement to treat central venous stenosis and occlusion in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas.支架置入治疗血液透析患者动静脉瘘中心静脉狭窄和闭塞的长期结果。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;22(9):1240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Endovascular stent placement in the treatment of upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.血管内支架置入术治疗血液透析患者上肢中心静脉阻塞
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Jan;49(1):81-5. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00370-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of refractory central venous occlusive disease treated by stent deployment in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.接受维持性血液透析的患者中,经支架置入治疗难治性中心静脉闭塞性疾病的长期预后。
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2463579. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2463579. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
2
Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions.中心静脉狭窄和闭塞的处理。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03461-7. Epub 2023 Jul 17.