Suppr超能文献

工作和个人资源在评估工作要求为挑战和障碍时的作用。

Role of job and personal resources in the appraisal of job demands as challenges and hindrances.

机构信息

Laboratory of Social Psychology, Ergonomics Department, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0248148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248148. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that challenge and hindrance job demands show different effects on employees' wellbeing and performance. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that employees' subjective appraisal of job demands as challenges and hindrances may vary: they can be appraised as challenges or hindrances or both. Subjective appraisal of job demands was found to be also related to employees' wellbeing and productivity. However, little is known about predictors of the appraisals of job demands made by employees. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of such appraisals among job and individual resources. Cross-sectional research was carried out among 426 IT, healthcare and public transport employees. COPSOQ II scales were used to measure job demands (emotional, quantitative, cognitive demands, work pace and role conflicts) and job resources (influence at work, possibilities for development, vertical and horizontal trust), single questions were used to measure employees' subjective appraisals of job demands as hindrances and challenges, and PCQ was used to measure psychological capital. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed that only horizontal trust predicted the appraisal of job demands as challenges, and vertical trust predicted the appraisal of job demands as hindrances among four analysed job resources. Individual resource-psychological capital-predicted only the appraisal of job demands as challenges. Control variables-occupation, age and job demands also played a significant role in predicting the appraisal of job demands. Implications and future directions are discussed.

摘要

先前的研究表明,挑战性和阻碍性工作要求对员工的幸福感和绩效有不同的影响。此外,已经证明,员工对工作要求的主观评估既可以视为挑战,也可以视为阻碍,或者两者兼而有之。对工作要求的主观评估也与员工的幸福感和生产力有关。然而,对于员工对工作要求的评估的预测因素知之甚少。本研究旨在确定工作和个体资源中这些评估的预测因素。在 426 名 IT、医疗保健和公共交通员工中进行了横断面研究。使用 COPSOQ II 量表来衡量工作要求(情绪、数量、认知要求、工作节奏和角色冲突)和工作资源(工作影响力、发展可能性、纵向和横向信任),使用单项问题来衡量员工对工作要求的主观评估,即阻碍和挑战,以及使用 PCQ 来衡量心理资本。多元层次回归分析表明,只有横向信任预测了工作要求作为挑战的评估,而纵向信任预测了工作要求作为阻碍的评估。个体资源——心理资本——仅预测了工作要求作为挑战的评估。控制变量——职业、年龄和工作要求在预测工作要求的评估中也起着重要作用。讨论了其影响和未来方向。

相似文献

6
When and Why Demands Reveal Their Challenging Potential during Change.变革中需求何时以及为何揭示其挑战性潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;18(24):13076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413076.

本文引用的文献

2
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Trust and cooperative behavior: Evidence from the realm of data-sharing.信任与合作行为:来自数据共享领域的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 21;14(8):e0220115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220115. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验