Tsai Meng-Ju, Cheng Cheng-Kuo
Department of Ophthalmology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Exp Optom. 2022 Jan;105(1):48-54. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1896333. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
: Optical coherence tomography biomarkers are dynamic and possibly change over time. The dynamic biomarkers may better predict improvement of final vision than those at baseline for diabetic macular oedema after treatment.: To investigate predictors for ellipsoid zone (EZ) dynamics and the association with visual acuity after treatment for diabetic macular oedema: A total of 135 eyes from 135 patients with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema were retrospectively enrolled in this study. EZ status was evaluated by optical coherence tomography at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Macular perfusion status was analysed by fluorescein angiography. Duration of EZ disruption was quantified by giving scores from 0 to 5 based on the sum of visits with evidence of EZ disruption. Linear regression models were used to predict factors for scores of EZ disruption. Binary logistic regression was used to predict various EZ biomarkers for final visual acuity improvement.: Thirty of 87 eyes (34.4%) with intact EZ at baseline developed subsequent EZ disruption. For those with EZ disruption at baseline, 17 of 48 (35.4%) patients had restoration of disrupted EZ over time. Non-perfused macula was associated with both earlier development of EZ disruption and poor restoration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively). Non-perfused macula, absence of epiretinal membrane, and EZ disruption at baseline predicted higher EZ scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.022 and p < 0.001, respectively). Higher EZ scores (p = 0.016), but not baseline EZ disruption (p = 0.56), were less likely to have improvement of final vision 5 letters or more.: Macular perfusion status played an independent role in EZ dynamics. Duration of EZ disruption could be more predictive than baseline status for improvement of vision over 12 months.
光学相干断层扫描生物标志物是动态的,可能随时间变化。对于糖尿病性黄斑水肿,动态生物标志物可能比基线时的生物标志物更能预测最终视力的改善情况。
研究糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗后椭圆体带(EZ)动态变化的预测因素及其与视力的关系。
本研究回顾性纳入了135例接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的135只眼。在基线、术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月时通过光学相干断层扫描评估EZ状态。通过荧光素血管造影分析黄斑灌注状态。根据有EZ中断证据的就诊次数总和,将EZ中断持续时间量化为0至5分。使用线性回归模型预测EZ中断评分的因素。使用二元逻辑回归预测最终视力改善的各种EZ生物标志物。
基线时EZ完整的87只眼中有30只(34.4%)随后发生了EZ中断。对于基线时EZ中断的患者,48例中有17例(35.4%)随着时间的推移中断的EZ得到了恢复。无灌注黄斑与EZ中断的早期发生和恢复不良均相关(分别为p<0.001和p=0.011)。无灌注黄斑、无视网膜前膜和基线时EZ中断预测较高的EZ评分(分别为p<0.001、p=0.022和p<0.001)。较高的EZ评分(p=0.016),而不是基线时的EZ中断(p=0.56),最终视力提高5个字母或更多的可能性较小。
黄斑灌注状态在EZ动态变化中起独立作用。EZ中断持续时间可能比基线状态更能预测12个月内视力的改善情况。