Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Pediatric cervical spine (CSI) and blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) are challenging to evaluate as they are rare but carry high morbidity and mortality. CT scans are the traditional imaging modality to evaluate for CSI/BCVI, but involve radiation exposure and potential future increased risk of malignancy. Therefore, we present results from the implementation of a combined CSI/BCVI pediatric trauma clinical pathway to aid clinicians in their decision-making.
We conducted a 2-year retrospective cohort study analyzing data pre and post implementation of the combined CSI/BCVI pathway. Data was obtained from a level 1 pediatric trauma center and included blunt trauma patients under the age of 14. We evaluated the use of cervical spine computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and plain radiographs, as well as missed injuries and provider pathway adherence.
We included 358 patients: 209 pre-pathway and 149 post-pathway implementation. Patient mean age was 8.9 years and 61% were male (61% males). There were no significant differences in GCS, AIS, and ISS between pre and post pathway groups. Post pathway implementation saw reduced use of cervical spine CT, although this was not clinically significant (33% vs 31%, p = 0.74). However, cervical spine radiography use increased (9% vs 16%, p = 0.03), and there was also an increase in screening for BCVI injuries with higher use of CTA (5% vs 7%, p = 0.52). A total of 12 CSI and 3 BCVI were identified with no missed injuries. Provider adherence to the pathway was modest (54%). Conclusion Implementation of a combined CSI/BCVI clinical pathway for pediatric trauma patients increased screening radiography and did not miss any injuries. However, CT use did not significantly decrease and provider adherence was modest, supporting the need for further implementation analysis and larger studies to validate the pathway's sensitivity and specificity for CSI/BCVI.
小儿颈椎(CSI)和钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的评估具有挑战性,因为它们虽然罕见,但发病率和死亡率很高。CT 扫描是评估 CSI/BCVI 的传统影像学方法,但涉及辐射暴露和未来恶性肿瘤风险增加的潜在风险。因此,我们介绍了实施小儿创伤联合 CSI/BCVI 临床路径的结果,以帮助临床医生做出决策。
我们进行了一项为期 2 年的回顾性队列研究,分析了实施联合 CSI/BCVI 通路前后的数据。数据来自一级儿科创伤中心,包括年龄在 14 岁以下的钝性创伤患者。我们评估了颈椎计算机断层扫描(CT)、CT 血管造影和普通 X 线摄影的使用情况,以及漏诊损伤和提供者路径依从性。
我们纳入了 358 例患者:209 例为路径实施前,149 例为路径实施后。患者平均年龄为 8.9 岁,61%为男性(61%为男性)。在 GCS、AIS 和 ISS 方面,路径实施前后组间无显著差异。虽然颈椎 CT 的使用有所减少,但这并不具有临床意义(33%比 31%,p=0.74)。然而,颈椎 X 线摄影的使用率增加(9%比 16%,p=0.03),并且随着 CTA 筛查 BCVI 损伤的增加,其使用率也有所增加(5%比 7%,p=0.52)。共发现 12 例 CSI 和 3 例 BCVI,无漏诊损伤。路径的提供者遵医率为 54%。结论:为小儿创伤患者实施 CSI/BCVI 联合临床路径增加了筛查 X 线摄影,且无任何漏诊损伤。然而,CT 的使用并未显著减少,提供者的依从性也较低,这支持需要进一步进行实施分析和更大规模的研究,以验证该路径对 CSI/BCVI 的敏感性和特异性。